Literature DB >> 19001690

Scan-rescan and intra-observer variability of magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Arvin Vidal1, Yves Bureau, Trevor Wade, J David Spence, Brian K Rutt, Aaron Fenster, Grace Parraga.   

Abstract

Carotid atherosclerosis measurements for eight subjects at baseline and 14 +/- 2 days later were examined using 1.5 T and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A single observer blinded to field strength, subject and timepoint manually segmented carotid artery wall and lumen boundaries in randomized images in five measurement trials. Mean increases in the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for T1-weighted images acquired at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T were 90% (scan) and 80% (rescan). Despite significantly improved SNR and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for images acquired at 3.0 T, vessel wall volume (VWV) intra-observer variability was not significantly different using coefficients of variation (COV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). VWV interscan variability and consistency at both field strengths were not statistically different (1.5 T/3.0 T COV = 5.7%/7.8%, R(2) = 0.96 for 1.5 T and R(2) = 0.87 for 3.0 T). A two-way analysis of variance showed a VWV dependence on field strength but not scan timepoint. In addition, a paired t-test showed significant differences in VWV measured at 3.0 T as compared to 1.5 T. These results suggest that although images acquired at 1.5 T have lower SNR and CNR VWV, measurement variability was not significantly different from 3.0 T VWV and that VWV is field-strength dependent which may be an important consideration for longitudinal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001690     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the genetics of coronary artery disease through the lens of noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Jose D Vargas; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2012-01

2.  Regional impact of field strength on voxel-based morphometry results.

Authors:  Christine L Tardif; D Louis Collins; G Bruce Pike
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Efficient flow suppressed MRI improves interscan reproducibility of carotid atherosclerosis plaque burden measurements.

Authors:  Li Dong; Jinnan Wang; Vasily L Yarnykh; Hunter R Underhill; Moni B Neradilek; Nayak Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Interstudy reproducibility of dark blood high-resolution MRI in evaluating basilar atherosclerotic plaque at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Luguang Chen; Qi Liu; Zhang Shi; Xia Tian; Wenjia Peng; Jianping Lu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 5.  Carotid plaque imaging and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Guangming Zhu; Jason Hom; Ying Li; Bin Jiang; Fatima Rodriguez; Dominik Fleischmann; David Saloner; Michele Porcu; Yanrong Zhang; Luca Saba; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-08

6.  Increasing spatial resolution of 3T MRI scanning improves reproducibility of carotid arterial wall dimension measurements.

Authors:  Diederik F van Wijk; Aart C Strang; Raphael Duivenvoorden; Dirk-Jan F Enklaar; Rob J van der Geest; John J P Kastelein; Eric de Groot; Erik S G Stroes; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Carotid magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring atherosclerotic plaque progression: a multicenter reproducibility study.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Daniel S Hippe; Thomas S Hatsukami; Daniel A Isquith; Kiyofumi Yamada; Moni B Neradilek; Gádor Cantón; Yunjing Xue; Jerome L Fleg; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Michael T Klimas; Robert J Padley; Maria T Vassileva; Bradley T Wyman; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 T: current state of the art.

Authors:  John N Oshinski; Jana G Delfino; Puneet Sharma; Ahmed M Gharib; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Carotid plaque regression following 6-month statin therapy assessed by 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with ultrasound intima media thickness.

Authors:  Raymond Q Migrino; Mark Bowers; Leanne Harmann; Robert Prost; John F LaDisa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Li Dong; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Rui Li; Jinnan Wang; Huijun Chen; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.