BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The emergence of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) as common MR imaging findings raises the question of how MR imaging parameters influence CMB detection. To evaluate the effects of modified gradient recalled-echo (GRE) MR imaging methods, we performed an analysis of sequence, section thickness, and field strength on CMB imaging properties and detection in subjects with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), a condition associated with microhemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple MR images were obtained from subjects with probable CAA, with varying sequences (GRE versus susceptibility-weighted imaging [SWI]), section thicknesses (1.2-1.5 versus 5 mm), and magnetic field strengths (1.5T versus 3T). Individual CMB were manually identified and analyzed for contrast index (lesion intensity normalized to normal-appearing white matter signal intensity) and diameter. CMB counts were compared between 1.5T thick-section GRE and thin-section SWI for 3 subjects who underwent both protocols in the same scanning session. RESULTS: With other parameters constant, use of SWI, thinner sections, and a higher field strength yielded medium-to-large gains in CMB contrast index (CI; Cohen d 0.71-1.87). SWI was also associated with small increases in CMB diameter (Cohen d <0.3). Conventional thick-section GRE identified only 33% of CMB (103 of 310) seen on thin-section SWI. Lesions prospectively identified on GRE had significantly greater CI and diameter measured on the GRE image than those not prospectively identified. CONCLUSIONS: The examined alternatives to conventional GRE MR imaging yield substantially improved CMB contrast and sensitivity for detection. Future studies based on these techniques will most likely yield even higher prevalence estimates for CMB.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The emergence of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) as common MR imaging findings raises the question of how MR imaging parameters influence CMB detection. To evaluate the effects of modified gradient recalled-echo (GRE) MR imaging methods, we performed an analysis of sequence, section thickness, and field strength on CMB imaging properties and detection in subjects with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), a condition associated with microhemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple MR images were obtained from subjects with probable CAA, with varying sequences (GRE versus susceptibility-weighted imaging [SWI]), section thicknesses (1.2-1.5 versus 5 mm), and magnetic field strengths (1.5T versus 3T). Individual CMB were manually identified and analyzed for contrast index (lesion intensity normalized to normal-appearing white matter signal intensity) and diameter. CMB counts were compared between 1.5T thick-section GRE and thin-section SWI for 3 subjects who underwent both protocols in the same scanning session. RESULTS: With other parameters constant, use of SWI, thinner sections, and a higher field strength yielded medium-to-large gains in CMB contrast index (CI; Cohen d 0.71-1.87). SWI was also associated with small increases in CMB diameter (Cohen d <0.3). Conventional thick-section GRE identified only 33% of CMB (103 of 310) seen on thin-section SWI. Lesions prospectively identified on GRE had significantly greater CI and diameter measured on the GRE image than those not prospectively identified. CONCLUSIONS: The examined alternatives to conventional GRE MR imaging yield substantially improved CMB contrast and sensitivity for detection. Future studies based on these techniques will most likely yield even higher prevalence estimates for CMB.
Authors: Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; E Mark Haacke; Karen A Tong; Nathaniel Wycliffe; Daniel K Kido; Yingbiao Xu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Djamel Haddar; Jürgen R Reichenbach Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: F Fazekas; R Kleinert; G Roob; G Kleinert; P Kapeller; R Schmidt; H P Hartung Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yannie O Y Soo; Song Ran Yang; Wynnie W M Lam; Adrian Wong; Yu Hua Fan; Howan H W Leung; Anne Y Y Chan; Cecilia Leung; Thomas W H Leung; Lawrence K S Wong Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Gregory A Dierksen; Maureen E Skehan; Muhammad A Khan; Jed Jeng; R N Kaveer Nandigam; John A Becker; Ashok Kumar; Krista L Neal; Rebecca A Betensky; Matthew P Frosch; Jonathan Rosand; Keith A Johnson; Anand Viswanathan; David H Salat; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jason Mackey; Jeffrey J Wing; Gina Norato; Ian Sobotka; Ravi S Menon; Richard E Burgess; M Chris Gibbons; Nawar M Shara; Stephen Fernandez; Annapurni Jayam-Trouth; Laura Russell; Dorothy F Edwards; Chelsea S Kidwell Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Ulrike Löbel; Jan Sedlacik; Noah D Sabin; Mehmet Kocak; Alberto Broniscer; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Zoltán Patay Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Thanakit Pongpitakmetha; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Marco Pasi; Gregoire Boulouis; Li Xiong; Andrew D Warren; Kristin M Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; M Edip Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan; Andreas Charidimou Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 9.910