Literature DB >> 19001464

Odor localization and sniffing.

Johannes Frasnelli1, Genevieve Charbonneau, Olivier Collignon, Franco Lepore.   

Abstract

For humans, the localization of an odorant seems only possible if the odorant also stimulates the trigeminal nerve. There is, however, some evidence that active sniffing may affect this ability and facilitate the localization of pure odorants. Therefore, we tested the ability of 40 subjects to localize a pure odorant and a mixed olfactory/trigeminal stimulus under 2 stimulation conditions: either odors were blown into the subjects' nostrils (passive) or subjects had to actively sniff the odors (active). Subjects could only reliably localize the mixed olfactory/trigeminal stimulus. However, we found a significant interaction between stimulation condition and nature of the odorant. So, the mixed olfactory/trigeminal stimulus was more localizable in the passive condition, whereas the pure odorant was better localized in the active condition. Interestingly, subjects had more correct answers after stimulation of the right nostril than of the left nostril (where subjects performed significantly below chance when stimulated with the pure odorant), suggesting possible laterality effects. These results suggest that active sniffing may affect our ability to localize odors. Other than mixed olfactory trigeminal stimuli, pure odorants are, however, not localizable even in active condition of sniffing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001464     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjn068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  24 in total

1.  Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: eugenol is an irritant.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Charles J Wysocki; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Unilateral reduced sense of smell is an early indicator for global olfactory loss.

Authors:  Volker Gudziol; Irene Paech; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Stereo and serial sniffing guide navigation to an odour source in a mammal.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; J Albrecht; B Bryant; J N Lundström
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Enhanced Odorant Localization Abilities in Congenitally Blind but not in Late-Blind Individuals.

Authors:  Simona Manescu; Christine Chouinard-Leclaire; Olivier Collignon; Franco Lepore; Johannes Frasnelli
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  Assessment of direct knowledge of the human olfactory system.

Authors:  Gregory Lane; Guangyu Zhou; Torben Noto; Christina Zelano
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; T Hummel; J Berg; G Huang; R L Doty
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Humans navigate with stereo olfaction.

Authors:  Yuli Wu; Kepu Chen; Yuting Ye; Tao Zhang; Wen Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interactions between behaviorally relevant rhythms and synaptic plasticity alter coding in the piriform cortex.

Authors:  Anne-Marie M Oswald; Nathaniel N Urban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.