Literature DB >> 19000814

Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2.

Xuelian Luo1, Hongtao Yu.   

Abstract

A given protein generally has only one native tertiary fold, which is the conformation with the lowest Gibbs free energy. Mad2, a protein involved in the spindle checkpoint, however, has two natively folded states with similar Gibbs free energies. Through binding to its target Cdc20, Mad2 inhibits the multisubunit ubiquitin ligase, the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C), and delays the onset of anaphase until all sister chromatids achieve bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. Without ligand binding or covalent modifications, Mad2 adopts two topologically and functionally distinct native folds in equilibrium under physiological conditions. The transition between the two Mad2 states is regulated by multiple mechanisms and is central to the activation and inactivation of the spindle checkpoint. This review summarizes recent structural and biochemical studies on the two-state behavior of Mad2 and discusses the generality and implications of structural malleability of proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000814      PMCID: PMC2644451          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  61 in total

Review 1.  Natively unfolded proteins.

Authors:  Anthony L Fink
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Anna De Antoni; Chad G Pearson; Daniela Cimini; Julie C Canman; Valeria Sala; Luigi Nezi; Marina Mapelli; Lucia Sironi; Mario Faretta; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics.

Authors:  Martin Vink; Marco Simonetta; Pietro Transidico; Karin Ferrari; Marina Mapelli; Anna De Antoni; Lucia Massimiliano; Andrea Ciliberto; Mario Faretta; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality.

Authors:  Itay Onn; Jill M Heidinger-Pauli; Vincent Guacci; Elçin Unal; Douglas E Koshland
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  L H Hwang; L F Lau; D L Smith; C A Mistrot; K G Hardwick; E S Hwang; A Amon; A W Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie.

Authors:  H Büeler; A Aguzzi; A Sailer; R A Greiner; P Autenried; M Aguet; C Weissmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-07-02       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Determinants of conformational dimerization of Mad2 and its inhibition by p31comet.

Authors:  Marina Mapelli; Fabian V Filipp; Giulia Rancati; Lucia Massimiliano; Luigi Nezi; Gunter Stier; Robert S Hagan; Stefano Confalonieri; Simonetta Piatti; Michael Sattler; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast.

Authors:  K G Hardwick; A W Murray
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores.

Authors:  R H Chen; A Shevchenko; M Mann; A W Murray
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-10-19       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  82 in total

1.  Closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) is selectively incorporated into the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC).

Authors:  Aaron R Tipton; Michael Tipton; Tim Yen; Song-Tao Liu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Structural insights into anaphase-promoting complex function and mechanism.

Authors:  David Barford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting.

Authors:  Soonjoung Kim; Hongbin Sun; Diana R Tomchick; Hongtao Yu; Xuelian Luo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex.

Authors:  William C H Chao; Kiran Kulkarni; Ziguo Zhang; Eric H Kong; David Barford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Monitoring the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation by the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  P Silva; J Barbosa; A V Nascimento; J Faria; R Reis; H Bousbaa
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 6.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells.

Authors:  Reto Gassmann; Andrew J Holland; Dileep Varma; Xiaohu Wan; Filiz Civril; Don W Cleveland; Karen Oegema; Edward D Salmon; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Phosphorylation of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates its conformational transition.

Authors:  Soonjoung Kim; Hongbin Sun; Haydn L Ball; Katja Wassmann; Xuelian Luo; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Bub1 and BubR1: at the interface between chromosome attachment and the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Sabine Elowe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.