Literature DB >> 18998163

Connectionist models of artificial grammar learning: what type of knowledge is acquired?

Annette Kinder1, Anja Lotz.   

Abstract

Two experiments are presented that test the predictions of two associative learning models of Artificial Grammar Learning. The two models are the simple recurrent network (SRN) and the competitive chunking (CC) model. The two experiments investigate acquisition of different types of knowledge in this task: knowledge of frequency and novelty of stimulus fragments (Experiment 1) and knowledge of letter positions, of small fragments, and of large fragments up to entire strings (Experiment 2). The results show that participants acquired all types of knowledge. Simulation studies demonstrate that the CC model explains the acquisition of all types of fragment knowledge but fails to account for the acquisition of positional knowledge. The SRN model, by contrast, accounts for the entire pattern of results found in the two experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18998163     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0177-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  12 in total

1.  Learning artificial grammars: no evidence for the acquisition of rules.

Authors:  A Kinder; A Assmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

2.  The knowledge acquired during artificial grammar learning: testing the predictions of two connectionist models.

Authors:  A Kinder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

3.  Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning.

Authors:  T Johnstone; D R Shanks
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Annette Kinder; David R Shanks; Josephine Cock; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-12

Review 5.  The rules versus similarity distinction.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 6.  Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet; Sebastien Pacton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Learning the structure of event sequences.

Authors:  A Cleeremans; J L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-09

8.  Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  D R Shanks; T Johnstone; L Staggs
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-02

9.  Amnesia and the declarative/nondeclarative distinction: a recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming.

Authors:  A Kinder; D R Shanks
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  2 in total

1.  Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy.

Authors:  Randall K Jamieson; Uliana Nevzorova; Graham Lee; D J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Comparing feedforward and recurrent neural network architectures with human behavior in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Andrea Alamia; Victor Gauducheau; Dimitri Paisios; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.