Literature DB >> 18997736

Heterogeneity of tumor prognostic markers: a reproducibility study applied to liver metastases of pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Anne Couvelard1, Lydia Deschamps, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, Alain Sauvanet, Olivia Hentic, Nathalie Colnot, Valérie Paradis, Jacques Belghiti, Pierre Bedossa, Philippe Ruszniewski.   

Abstract

Liver biopsy of metastatic pancreatic endocrine tumors allows confirmation of the diagnosis and assessment of prognosis. However, sampling variability is a potential limitation. Our aim was to use the tissue microarray technique to assess the heterogeneity of three prognostic markers, ie, MIB-1 proliferation index, microvascular density and somatostatin receptor type 2, inside single or between synchronous or metachronous liver metastases of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Tissue microarrays were constructed, which included core biopsies taken from surgically resected liver metastases in 29 patients. MIB-1, microvascular density and somatostatin receptor type 2 were evaluated after immunostaining. The heterogeneity was highlighted by the calculation of the reproducibility of the values of two cores randomly selected among all the cores studied. For quantitative variables, it was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient and by a Bland-Altman approach. For qualitative variables, observed agreement and weighted kappa were given. A total of 184 liver metastases were analyzed. For MIB-1, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.63, 0.69 and 0.67 and for microvascular density, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.48, 0.60 and 0.00, respectively, in single, synchronous and metachronous liver metastases. The variability increased for higher mean values of microvascular density. For somatostatin receptor type 2, the observed agreements were 91% (kappa=0.81), 69% (kappa=0.49) and 79% (kappa=0.68) in single, synchronous and metachronous liver metastases, respectively. In conclusion, tissue microarray analysis identifies heterogeneity of protein expression in pancreatic endocrine metastases, which depends on the marker tested. The reproducibility is better for MIB-1 and somatostatin receptor type 2 than for microvascular density. Sampling variability should be taken into consideration as a potential limitation to the assessment of prognostic and therapeutic markers in biopsy samples from metastatic pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997736     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  24 in total

1.  Grading of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is improved by the inclusion of both Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic rate.

Authors:  Chad M McCall; Chanjuan Shi; Toby C Cornish; David S Klimstra; Laura H Tang; Olca Basturk; Liew Jun Mun; Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  The pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: common questions and tentative answers.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Luisella Righi; Alfredo Berruti; Guido Rindi; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Prognostication and response assessment in liver and pancreatic tumors: The new imaging.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Gino Puntel; Silvia Ortolani; Sara Cingarlini; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Liver metastases of small intestine neuroendocrine tumors: Ki-67 heterogeneity and World Health Organization grade discordance with primary tumors.

Authors:  Chanjuan Shi; Raul S Gonzalez; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; Toby C Cornish; Kenneth R Hande; Ronald Walker; Martin Sandler; Jordan Berlin; Eric H Liu
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  KI-67 heterogeneity in well differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: when is biopsy reliable for grade assessment?

Authors:  Federica Grillo; Luca Valle; Diego Ferone; Manuela Albertelli; Maria Pia Brisigotti; Giuseppe Cittadini; Alessandro Vanoli; Roberto Fiocca; Luca Mastracci
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Ki-67 cytological index can distinguish well-differentiated from poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative cytohistological study of 53 cases.

Authors:  Gabriele Carlinfante; Paola Baccarini; Debora Berretti; Tiziana Cassetti; Maurizio Cavina; Rita Conigliaro; Alessandro De Pellegrin; Luca Di Tommaso; Carlo Fabbri; Adele Fornelli; Andrea Frasoldati; Giorgio Gardini; Luisa Losi; Livia Maccio; Raffaele Manta; Nico Pagano; Romano Sassatelli; Silvia Serra; Lorenzo Camellini
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Antiproliferative effects of somatostatin analogs in endocrine tumours.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Zatelli
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-05-08

8.  Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors <2 cm on preoperative imaging are associated with a low incidence of nodal metastasis and an excellent overall survival.

Authors:  Paul A Toste; Brian E Kadera; Sergei F Tatishchev; David W Dawson; Barbara M Clerkin; Raman Muthusamy; Rabindra Watson; James S Tomlinson; Oscar J Hines; Howard A Reber; Timothy R Donahue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Role of Ki-67 proliferation index in the assessment of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasias regarding the stage of disease.

Authors:  H C Miller; P Drymousis; R Flora; R Goldin; D Spalding; A Frilling
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Securin promotes the identification of favourable outcome in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  K Talvinen; H Karra; S Hurme; M Nykänen; A Nieminen; J Anttinen; T Kuopio; P Kronqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.