Literature DB >> 18997079

Effects of social interactions on empirical responses to selection for average daily gain of boars.

C Y Chen1, R K Johnson, S Newman, S D Kachman, L D Van Vleck.   

Abstract

Effects of social interactions on responses to selection for ADG were examined with records of 9,720 boars from dam lines (1 and 2) and sire lines (3 and 4) provided by Pig Improvement Company. Each line was analyzed separately. Pens contained 15 boars. Average daily gains were measured from about 71 to 161 d of age and BW from 31 to 120 kg. Models included fixed effects of contemporary groups and initial test age as a covariate and random direct genetic (a), social genetic (c), social environmental (ce), and litter (lt) effects. Estimates of direct heritability with model 1 (the full model with a, c, ce, and lt) were 0.21, 0.28, 0.13, and 0.15 for lines 1 to 4. Estimates of heritability of social effects were near zero. Estimates of total heritable variance were 55, 52, 38, and 96% of phenotypic variance for lines 1 through 4. Empirical responses to selection with model 1 were calculated using the parameter estimates from model 1. For response of 1 genetic SD for both components (a and c), the proportions of expected total gain due to social effects (with economic weights of 1 and pen size-1 = 14) were 54, 28, 65, and 65% for the 4 lines. Genetic superiorities of the top 10% of boars were calculated for boars ranked using reduced models, but with EBV calculated using the full model (model 1). Average total breeding values (ETBV = EBV(a)+14EBV(c)) for the top 10% of boars selected with model 1 were 74.08, 94.26, 31.79, and 92.88 g for lines 1 through 4, respectively. For rankings based on model 2 (a, ce, and lt), but EBV calculated with model 1, average total breeding values for the top 10% were 68.15, 94.03, 7.33, and 84.72 g with empirical correlated responses for genetic social effects from selection for direct effects of 0.93, 1.89, -2.19, and 3.52 g for lines 1 to 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997079     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-0937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Using pooled data to estimate variance components and breeding values for traits affected by social interactions.

Authors:  Katrijn Peeters; Esther Dorien Ellen; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Indirect genetic effects for survival in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) are magnified in crossbred genotypes and show a parent-of-origin effect.

Authors:  K Peeters; T T Eppink; E D Ellen; J Visscher; P Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate.

Authors:  M Ragab; M Piles; R Quintanilla; J P Sánchez
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Whole-genome re-sequencing association study for direct genetic effects and social genetic effects of six growth traits in Large White pigs.

Authors:  Pingxian Wu; Kai Wang; Qiang Yang; Jie Zhou; Dejuan Chen; Yihui Liu; Jideng Ma; Qianzi Tang; Long Jin; Weihang Xiao; Pinger Lou; Anan Jiang; Yanzhi Jiang; Li Zhu; Mingzhou Li; Xuewei Li; Guoqing Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.

Authors:  Hooi Ling Khaw; Raul W Ponzoni; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Interaction of direct and social genetic effects with feeding regime in growing rabbits.

Authors:  Miriam Piles; Ingrid David; Josep Ramon; Laurianne Canario; Oriol Rafel; Mariam Pascual; Mohamed Ragab; Juan P Sánchez
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Selection for feed efficiency using the social effects animal model in growing Duroc pigs: evaluation by simulation.

Authors:  William Herrera-Cáceres; Juan Pablo Sánchez
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.