Literature DB >> 18997038

Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scans.

May Sadik1, Iman Hamadeh, Pierre Nordblom, Madis Suurkula, Peter Höglund, Mattias Ohlsson, Lars Edenbrandt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system based on image-processing techniques and artificial neural networks for the interpretation of bone scans performed to determine the presence or absence of metastases.
METHODS: A training group of 810 consecutive patients who had undergone bone scintigraphy due to suspected metastatic disease were included in the study. Whole-body images, anterior and posterior views, were obtained after an injection of (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate. The image-processing techniques included algorithms for automatic segmentation of the skeleton and automatic detection and feature extraction of hot spots. Two sets of artificial neural networks were used to classify the images, 1 classifying each hot spot separately and the other classifying the whole bone scan. A test group of 59 patients with breast or prostate cancer was used to evaluate the CAD system. The patients in the test group were selected to reflect the spectrum of pathology found in everyday clinical work. As the gold standard for the test group, we used the final clinical assessment of each case. This assessment was based on follow-up scans and other clinical data, including the results of laboratory tests, and available diagnostic images, such as from MRI, CT, and radiography, from a mean follow-up period of 4.8 y.
RESULTS: The CAD system correctly identified 19 of the 21 patients with metastases in the test group, showing a sensitivity of 90%. False-positive classification of metastases was made in 4 of the 38 patients not classified as having metastases by the gold standard, resulting in a specificity of 89%.
CONCLUSION: A completely automated CAD system can be used to detect metastases in bone scans. Application of the method as a clinical decision support tool appears to have significant potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997038     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  30 in total

1.  A novel automated platform for quantifying the extent of skeletal tumour involvement in prostate cancer patients using the Bone Scan Index.

Authors:  David Ulmert; Reza Kaboteh; Josef J Fox; Caroline Savage; Michael J Evans; Hans Lilja; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Thomas Björk; Axel Gerdtsson; Anders Bjartell; Peter Gjertsson; Peter Höglund; Milan Lomsky; Mattias Ohlsson; Jens Richter; May Sadik; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Karl Sjöstrand; Alice Yu; Madis Suurküla; Lars Edenbrandt; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Analytic Validation of the Automated Bone Scan Index as an Imaging Biomarker to Standardize Quantitative Changes in Bone Scans of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Aseem Anand; Michael J Morris; Reza Kaboteh; Lena Båth; May Sadik; Peter Gjertsson; Milan Lomsky; Lars Edenbrandt; David Minarik; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Developing imaging strategies for castration resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Josef J Fox; Michael J Morris; Steven M Larson; Heiko Schöder; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Association between bone scan index and activities of daily living in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ikuno Ito; Kimiteru Ito; Shinichi Takahashi; Mitsuko Horibe; Rui Karita; Chika Nishizaka; Takako Nagai; Kohei Hamada; Hiroyuki Sato; Naoko Shindo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Deep Learning for the Automatic Diagnosis and Analysis of Bone Metastasis on Bone Scintigrams.

Authors:  Simin Liu; Ming Feng; Tingting Qiao; Haidong Cai; Kele Xu; Xiaqing Yu; Wen Jiang; Zhongwei Lv; Yin Wang; Dan Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Diagnostic performance of deep learning models for detecting bone metastasis on whole-body bone scan in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sangwon Han; Jungsu S Oh; Jong Jin Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  An automatic fine-grained skeleton segmentation method for whole-body bone scintigraphy using atlas-based registration.

Authors:  Jianan Wei; Huawei Cai; Yong Pi; Zhen Zhao; Zhang Yi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Current state of bone scintigraphy protocols and practice in Japan.

Authors:  Hajime Ichikawa; Kenta Miwa; Koichi Okuda; Takayuki Shibutani; Toyohiro Kato; Akio Nagaki; Hiroyuki Tsushima; Masahisa Onoguchi
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020

9.  Computer-aided diagnosis system for bone scintigrams from Japanese patients: importance of training database.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Horikoshi; Akihiro Kikuchi; Masahisa Onoguchi; Karl Sjöstrand; Lars Edenbrandt
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 2.668

10.  Quantitative Analysis of Torso FDG-PET Scans by Using Anatomical Standardization of Normal Cases from Thorough Physical Examinations.

Authors:  Takeshi Hara; Tatsunori Kobayashi; Satoshi Ito; Xiangrong Zhou; Tetsuro Katafuchi; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.