Literature DB >> 18996440

Vergence in reverspective: percept-driven versus data-driven eye movement control.

Michael Wagner1, Walter H Ehrenstein, Thomas V Papathomas.   

Abstract

'Reverspectives' (by artist Patrick Hughes) consist of truncated pyramids with their small faces closer to the viewer, allowing realistic scenes to be painted on them. Because their pictorial perspective reverses the physical depth arrangement, reverspectives provide a bistable paradigm of two radically different, competing depth percepts, even when viewed binocularly: points that are physically further are perceived to be closer and vice versa. The key question addressed here is whether vergence is governed by the physical and/or the perceived depth of fixated targets. Vergence eye movements were recorded using the EyeLink II system under conditions optimized to obtain both the veridical and illusory depth percepts of a reverspective. Six gaze locations were signaled by LEDs placed at strategically selected depths on the stimulus surface. We obtained strong evidence that stable vergence fixations were governed by the percept: for the same LED position, eyes converged under veridical depth percepts and diverged under illusory percepts, thus rendering pictorial cues to be as effective as physical cues in vergence control. These results, obtained with stable fixations, do not disagree with earlier studies that found rapid fixational eye movements to be governed by physical depth cues. Together, these results allow us to speculate on the existence of at least two eye movement systems: an automatic, data-driven system for rapid successions of fixations; and a deliberate schema-driven vergence system that accounts for stable fixations based on the perceptual state of the observer.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18996440     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  7 in total

1.  Binocular eye movements evoked by self-induced motion parallax.

Authors:  Jared Frey; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Pinhole Viewing Strengthens the Hollow-Face Illusion.

Authors:  Trent Koessler; Harold Hill
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-08-31

3.  Convexity Bias and Perspective Cues in the Reverse-Perspective Illusion.

Authors:  Joshua J Dobias; Thomas V Papathomas; Vanja M Vlajnic
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Size matters: How reaching and vergence movements are influenced by the familiar size of stereoscopically presented objects.

Authors:  Rebekka S Schubert; Maarten L Jung; Jens R Helmert; Boris M Velichkovsky; Sebastian Pannasch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Where do the eyes really go in the hollow-face illusion?

Authors:  Marc Grosjean; Gerhard Rinkenauer; Stephanie Jainta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Frontal eye field, where art thou? Anatomy, function, and non-invasive manipulation of frontal regions involved in eye movements and associated cognitive operations.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Romain Quentin; Lorena Chanes; Andres Mitsumasu; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-22

7.  Automatically Characterizing Sensory-Motor Patterns Underlying Reach-to-Grasp Movements on a Physical Depth Inversion Illusion.

Authors:  Jillian Nguyen; Ushma V Majmudar; Jay H Ravaliya; Thomas V Papathomas; Elizabeth B Torres
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.