Literature DB >> 18996393

Structural basis of restoring sequence-specific DNA binding and transactivation to mutant p53 by suppressor mutations.

Oded Suad1, Haim Rozenberg, Ran Brosh, Yael Diskin-Posner, Naama Kessler, Linda J W Shimon, Felix Frolow, Atar Liran, Varda Rotter, Zippora Shakked.   

Abstract

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is mutated in more than 50% of invasive cancers. About 30% of the mutations are found in six major "hot spot" codons located in its DNA binding core domain. To gain structural insight into the deleterious effects of such mutations and their rescue by suppressor mutations, we determined the crystal structures of the p53 core domain incorporating the hot spot mutation R249S, the core domain incorporating R249S and a second-site suppressor mutation H168R (referred to as the double mutant R249S/H168R) and its sequence-specific complex with DNA and of the triple mutant R249S/H168R/T123A. The structural studies were accompanied by transactivation and apoptosis experiments. The crystal structures show that the region at the vicinity of the mutation site in the R249S mutant displays a range of conformations [wild-type (wt) and several mutant-type conformations] due to the loss of stabilizing interactions mediated by R249 in the wt protein. As a consequence, the protein surface that is critical to the formation of functional p53-DNA complexes, through protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, is largely distorted in the mutant conformations, thus explaining the protein's "loss of function" as a transcription factor. The structure of this region is restored in both R249S/H168R and R249S/H168R/T123A and is further stabilized in the complex of R249S/H168R with DNA. Our functional data show that the introduction of H168R as a second-site suppressor mutation partially restores the transactivation capacity of the protein and that this effect is further amplified by the addition of a third-site mutation T123A. These findings together with previously reported data on wt and mutant p53 provide a structural framework for understanding p53 dysfunction as a result of oncogenic mutations and its rescue by suppressor mutations and for a potential drug design aimed at restoring wt activity to aberrant p53 proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18996393     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  23 in total

1.  SPATA18, a spermatogenesis-associated gene, is a novel transcriptional target of p53 and p63.

Authors:  Chamutal Bornstein; Ran Brosh; Alina Molchadsky; Shalom Madar; Ira Kogan-Sakin; Ido Goldstein; Deepavali Chakravarti; Elsa R Flores; Naomi Goldfinger; Rachel Sarig; Varda Rotter
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs.

Authors:  Malka Kitayner; Haim Rozenberg; Remo Rohs; Oded Suad; Dov Rabinovich; Barry Honig; Zippora Shakked
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  QM-MM simulations on p53-DNA complex: a study of hot spot and rescue mutants.

Authors:  Shruti Koulgi; Archana Achalere; Neeru Sharma; Uddhavesh Sonavane; Rajendra Joshi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Proteogenomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yongchao Dou; Emily A Kawaler; Daniel Cui Zhou; Marina A Gritsenko; Chen Huang; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Vladislav A Petyuk; Sara R Savage; Shankha Satpathy; Wenke Liu; Yige Wu; Chia-Feng Tsai; Bo Wen; Zhi Li; Song Cao; Jamie Moon; Zhiao Shi; MacIntosh Cornwell; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Rosalie K Chu; Suhas Vasaikar; Hua Zhou; Qingsong Gao; Ronald J Moore; Kai Li; Sunantha Sethuraman; Matthew E Monroe; Rui Zhao; David Heiman; Karsten Krug; Karl Clauser; Ramani Kothadia; Yosef Maruvka; Alexander R Pico; Amanda E Oliphant; Emily L Hoskins; Samuel L Pugh; Sean J I Beecroft; David W Adams; Jonathan C Jarman; Andy Kong; Hui-Yin Chang; Boris Reva; Yuxing Liao; Dmitry Rykunov; Antonio Colaprico; Xi Steven Chen; Andrzej Czekański; Marcin Jędryka; Rafał Matkowski; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Tara Hiltke; Emily Boja; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; David Mutch; Katherine Fuh; Matthew J Ellis; Deborah DeLair; Mathangi Thiagarajan; D R Mani; Gad Getz; Michael Noble; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Pei Wang; Matthew L Anderson; Douglas A Levine; Richard D Smith; Samuel H Payne; Kelly V Ruggles; Karin D Rodland; Li Ding; Bing Zhang; Tao Liu; David Fenyö
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Rescue of deleterious mutations by the compensatory Y30F mutation in ketosteroid isomerase.

Authors:  Hyung Jin Cha; Do Soo Jang; Yeon-Gil Kim; Bee Hak Hong; Jae-Sung Woo; Kyong-Tai Kim; Kwan Yong Choi
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 6.  Mutant p53: one name, many proteins.

Authors:  William A Freed-Pastor; Carol Prives
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Dipeptide analysis of p53 mutations and evolution of p53 family proteins.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Long Yu; Arnold J Levine; Ruth Nussinov; Buyong Ma
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-04-10

Review 8.  Contribution of p53 to metastasis.

Authors:  Emily Powell; David Piwnica-Worms; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 9.  When mutants gain new powers: news from the mutant p53 field.

Authors:  Ran Brosh; Varda Rotter
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Cooperativity dominates the genomic organization of p53-response elements: a mechanistic view.

Authors:  Yongping Pan; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.