Literature DB >> 18995890

PCA3 urine mRNA testing for prostate carcinoma: patterns of use by community urologists and assay performance in reference laboratory setting.

Scott B Shappell1, John Fulmer, David Arguello, Brian S Wright, Jonathan R Oppenheimer, Mathew J Putzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Multiple trials have shown the high specificity of urine prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) compared with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for biopsy detection of prostate carcinoma. We characterized the patterns of use of PCA3 by community urologists and determined the performance of PCA3 testing as a laboratory-developed test in a reference laboratory setting.
METHODS: The urine PCA3 and PSA mRNA levels after digital rectal examination were determined using transcription-mediated amplification. The cutoff for a positive PCA3 score (PCA3/PSA mRNA x 10(3)) were pre-established at > or = 35. The PCA3 results were correlated with the serum PSA level, previous biopsy history, and the prostate biopsy findings.
RESULTS: A total of 278 PCA3 tests were performed from December 2006 to June 2007. Of the PCA3 tested patients, 55.5% had previously undergone > or = 1 prostate biopsy; 92.7% had a PSA level > or = 2.5 ng/mL. The PCA3 test informative rate was 97.5%. For 50 samples that were also analyzed at a separate laboratory, concordance was achieved in 94%. The mean and median PCA3 score was 44.3 and 21.1, respectively. No correlation was found with the serum PSA level. The PCA3 test was negative in 16 of 19 patients with negative concurrent biopsy findings and positive in 8 of 11 with positive concurrent biopsy findings (sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 84.2%). Of 32 patients (70% with previous biopsy) who had undergone biopsy an average of 56 days after positive PCA3 test results, prostate carcinoma was detected in 41%.
CONCLUSIONS: Urine PCA3 testing on the transcription-mediated amplification platform performed well as a laboratory-developed test. The high specificity of PCA3 was confirmed. In patients with elevated PSA levels and negative biopsy findings, PCA3 testing might be useful in choosing between repeat biopsy and more conservative follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18995890     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Uro-oncology--update 2009].

Authors:  T Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Long non-coding RNAs in cancer: implications for personalized therapy.

Authors:  Marianna Vitiello; Andrea Tuccoli; Laura Poliseno
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of urine prostate cancer antigen 3 test using a cutoff value of 35 μg/L in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bin Hu; Hongmei Yang; Hongwei Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-27

Review 4.  Long Noncoding RNAs as Innovative Urinary Diagnostic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Giulia Brisotto; Roberto Guerrieri; Francesca Colizzi; Agostino Steffan; Barbara Montico; Elisabetta Fratta
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Projecting Benefits and Harms of Novel Cancer Screening Biomarkers: A Study of PCA3 and Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jeanette K Birnbaum; Ziding Feng; Roman Gulati; Jing Fan; Yair Lotan; John T Wei; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Assessment of long-term outcomes associated with urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Scott A Tomlins; Christine L Barnett; Todd M Morgan; James E Montie; John T Wei; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  The use of PCA3 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daphne Hessels; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Evaluation of prostate cancer antigen 3 for detecting prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Wenzhou Cao; Quan Li; Hua Shen; Chao Liu; Junpeng Deng; Jiangfeng Xu; Qiang Shao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Markers for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Raymond A Clarke; Horst J Schirra; James W Catto; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.