Literature DB >> 25613117

Projecting Benefits and Harms of Novel Cancer Screening Biomarkers: A Study of PCA3 and Prostate Cancer.

Jeanette K Birnbaum1, Ziding Feng2, Roman Gulati3, Jing Fan4, Yair Lotan5, John T Wei6, Ruth Etzioni7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New biomarkers for early detection of cancer must pass through several phases of development. Early phases provide information on diagnostic properties but not on population benefits and harms. Prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) is a promising prostate cancer biomarker still in early development. We use simulation modeling to project the impact of adding PCA3 to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening on prostate cancer detection and mortality in the United States.
METHODS: We used data from a recent study of PCA3 in men referred for prostate biopsy to extend an existing simulation model of PSA growth, disease progression, and survival. We specified several PSA-PCA3 strategies designed to improve specificity and reduce overdiagnosis. Using these strategies to screen a cohort of men biennially between ages 50 and 74, we projected true- and false-positive tests, overdiagnoses, and lives saved relative to a PSA-based strategy with a cutoff of 4.0 ng/mL for biopsy referral.
RESULTS: We identified several PSA-PCA3 strategies that substantially reduced false-positive tests and overdiagnoses while preserving the majority of lives saved. PCA3>35 for biopsy referral in men with PSA between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/mL retained 85% of lives saved while approximately halving false positives and reducing overdiagnoses by 25%.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding PCA3 to PSA screening can significantly reduce adverse screening outcomes. Strategies can be identified that preserve most of the lives saved relative to PSA-based screening. IMPACT: Simulation modeling provides advance projections of population outcomes of new screening biomarkers and may help guide early detection research. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613117      PMCID: PMC4383671          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The relationship between Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) and prostate cancer significance.

Authors:  Hein van Poppel; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Alexandre de la Taille; Jacques Irani; Theo de Reijke; Mesut Remzi; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Trends in biomarker research for cancer detection.

Authors:  P R Srinivas; B S Kramer; S Srivastava
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Biopsy and treatment decisions in the initial management of prostate cancer and the role of PCA3; a systematic analysis of expert opinion.

Authors:  Bertrand Tombal; Filip Ameye; Alexandre de la Taille; Theo de Reijke; Paolo Gontero; Alexander Haese; Paul Kil; Paul Perrin; Mesut Remzi; Jörg Schröder; Mark Speakman; Alessandro Volpe; Bianca Meesen; Herman Stoevelaar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Jennifer M Croswell; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Ian Blazina; Rongwei Fu; Ken Gleitsmann; Helen C Koenig; Clarence Lam; Ashley Maltz; J Bruin Rugge; Kenneth Lin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Can urinary PCA3 supplement PSA in the early detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  John T Wei; Ziding Feng; Alan W Partin; Elissa Brown; Ian Thompson; Lori Sokoll; Daniel W Chan; Yair Lotan; Adam S Kibel; J Erik Busby; Mohamed Bidair; Daniel W Lin; Samir S Taneja; Rosalia Viterbo; Aron Y Joon; Jackie Dahlgren; Jacob Kagan; Sudhir Srivastava; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Contemporary role of prostate cancer antigen 3 in the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marco Auprich; Anders Bjartell; Felix K-H Chun; Alexandre de la Taille; Stephen J Freedland; Alexander Haese; Jack Schalken; Arnulf Stenzl; Bertrand Tombal; Henk van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  How does early detection by screening affect disease progression? Modeling estimated benefits in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Wever; Gerrit Draisma; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  A three-gene panel on urine increases PSA specificity in the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marina Rigau; Israel Ortega; Maria Carmen Mir; Carlos Ballesteros; Marta Garcia; Marta Llauradó; Eva Colás; Núria Pedrola; Melania Montes; Tamara Sequeiros; Tugce Ertekin; Blanca Majem; Jacques Planas; Anna Ruiz; Miguel Abal; Alex Sánchez; Juan Morote; Jaume Reventós; Andreas Doll
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  8 in total

1.  Overdiagnosis and Lives Saved by Reflex Testing Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Todd M Morgan; Teresa A'mar; Sarah P Psutka; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  What's new in screening in 2015?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Management-Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Felice Crocetto; Gianluca Russo; Erika Di Zazzo; Pasquale Pisapia; Benito Fabio Mirto; Alessandro Palmieri; Francesco Pepe; Claudio Bellevicine; Alessandro Russo; Evelina La Civita; Daniela Terracciano; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone; Biagio Barone
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  The need for a personalized approach for prostate cancer management.

Authors:  J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 5.  The regulatory roles of long noncoding RNAs in the biological behavior of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ying Li; Xiaojuan Yang; Xiaoning Kang; Shanglong Liu
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

6.  E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study.

Authors:  Ola Spjuth; Andreas Karlsson; Mark Clements; Keith Humphreys; Emma Ivansson; Jim Dowling; Martin Eklund; Alexandra Jauhiainen; Kamila Czene; Henrik Grönberg; Pär Sparén; Fredrik Wiklund; Abbas Cheddad; Þorgerður Pálsdóttir; Mattias Rantalainen; Linda Abrahamsson; Erwin Laure; Jan-Eric Litton; Juni Palmgren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Urine Cell-Free DNA Integrity Analysis for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Samanta Salvi; Giorgia Gurioli; Filippo Martignano; Flavia Foca; Roberta Gunelli; Giacomo Cicchetti; Ugo De Giorgi; Wainer Zoli; Daniele Calistri; Valentina Casadio
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 8.  Virus encoded circulatory miRNAs for early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jayoung Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.264

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.