BACKGROUND: Heatwaves present a significant health risk and the hazard is likely to escalate with the increased future temperatures presently predicted by climate change models. The impact of heatwaves is often felt strongest in towns and cities where populations are concentrated and where the climate is often unintentionally modified to produce an urban heat island effect; where urban areas can be significantly warmer than surrounding rural areas. The purpose of this interdisciplinary study is to integrate remotely sensed urban heat island data alongside commercial social segmentation data via a spatial risk assessment methodology in order to highlight potential heat health risk areas and build the foundations for a climate change risk assessment. This paper uses the city of Birmingham, UK as a case study area. RESULTS: When looking at vulnerable sections of the population, the analysis identifies a concentration of "very high" risk areas within the city centre, and a number of pockets of "high risk" areas scattered throughout the conurbation. Further analysis looks at household level data which yields a complicated picture with a considerable range of vulnerabilities at a neighbourhood scale. CONCLUSIONS: The results illustrate that a concentration of "very high" risk people live within the urban heat island, and this should be taken into account by urban planners and city centre environmental managers when considering climate change adaptation strategies or heatwave alert schemes. The methodology has been designed to be transparent and to make use of powerful and readily available datasets so that it can be easily replicated in other urban areas.
BACKGROUND: Heatwaves present a significant health risk and the hazard is likely to escalate with the increased future temperatures presently predicted by climate change models. The impact of heatwaves is often felt strongest in towns and cities where populations are concentrated and where the climate is often unintentionally modified to produce an urban heat island effect; where urban areas can be significantly warmer than surrounding rural areas. The purpose of this interdisciplinary study is to integrate remotely sensed urban heat island data alongside commercial social segmentation data via a spatial risk assessment methodology in order to highlight potential heat health risk areas and build the foundations for a climate change risk assessment. This paper uses the city of Birmingham, UK as a case study area. RESULTS: When looking at vulnerable sections of the population, the analysis identifies a concentration of "very high" risk areas within the city centre, and a number of pockets of "high risk" areas scattered throughout the conurbation. Further analysis looks at household level data which yields a complicated picture with a considerable range of vulnerabilities at a neighbourhood scale. CONCLUSIONS: The results illustrate that a concentration of "very high" risk people live within the urban heat island, and this should be taken into account by urban planners and city centre environmental managers when considering climate change adaptation strategies or heatwave alert schemes. The methodology has been designed to be transparent and to make use of powerful and readily available datasets so that it can be easily replicated in other urban areas.
Authors: Jason G Su; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Bill M Jesdale; Amy D Kyle; Bhavna Shamasunder; Michael Jerrett Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Sharon L Harlan; Anthony J Brazel; Lela Prashad; William L Stefanov; Larissa Larsen Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2006-09-25 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Colleen E Reid; Marie S O'Neill; Carina J Gronlund; Shannon J Brines; Daniel G Brown; Ana V Diez-Roux; Joel Schwartz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Pablo Méndez-Lázaro; Frank E Muller-Karger; Daniel Otis; Matthew J McCarthy; Ernesto Rodríguez Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 3.787
Authors: Tran Ngoc Dang; Doan Quang Van; Hiroyuki Kusaka; Xerxes T Seposo; Yasushi Honda Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Molly C Bernhard; Shia T Kent; Meagan E Sloan; Mary B Evans; Leslie A McClure; Julia M Gohlke Journal: Environ Res Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Marco Morabito; Alfonso Crisci; Beniamino Gioli; Giovanni Gualtieri; Piero Toscano; Valentina Di Stefano; Simone Orlandini; Gian Franco Gensini Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lin Zhou; Zheng Xin; Li Bai; Fangjun Wan; Yongming Wang; Shaowei Sang; Shouqin Liu; Ji Zhang; Qiyong Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.390