Literature DB >> 18992276

The science of interpersonal touch: an overview.

Alberto Gallace1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Surprisingly little scientific research has been conducted on the topic of interpersonal touch over the years, despite the importance of touch in our everyday social interactions from birth through to adulthood and old age. In this review, we critically evaluate the results of the research on this topic that have emerged from disciplines, such as cognitive and social psychology, neuroscience, and cultural anthropology. We highlight some of the most important advances to have been made in our understanding of this topic: For example, research has shown that interpersonal tactile stimulation provides an effective means of influencing people's social behaviors (such as modulating their tendency to comply with requests, in affecting people's attitudes toward specific services, in creating bonds between couples or groups, and in strengthening romantic relationships), regardless of whether or not the tactile contact itself can be remembered explicitly. What is more, interpersonal touch can be used to communicate emotion in a manner similar to that demonstrated previously in vision and audition. The recent growth of studies investigating the potential introduction of tactile sensations to long-distance communication technologies (by means of mediated or 'virtual' touch) are also reviewed briefly. Finally, we highlight the synergistic effort that will be needed by researchers in different disciplines if we are to develop a more complete understanding of interpersonal touch in the years to come.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18992276     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  106 in total

1.  Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch.

Authors:  Valeria Gazzola; Michael L Spezio; Joset A Etzel; Fulvia Castelli; Ralph Adolphs; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

3.  Sexuality and physical contact in National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Wave 2.

Authors:  Adena M Galinsky; Martha K McClintock; Linda J Waite
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Sexual touching and difficulties with sexual arousal and orgasm among U.S. older adults.

Authors:  Adena M Galinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2011-12-08

5.  Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans.

Authors:  Line S Löken; Johan Wessberg; India Morrison; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  The skin as a social organ.

Authors:  India Morrison; Line S Löken; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Tactile motion lacks momentum.

Authors:  Gianluca Macauda; Bigna Lenggenhager; Rebekka Meier; Gregory Essick; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-08

8.  Stroking and tapping the skin: behavioral and electrodermal effects.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Carlotta Carta; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Rough primes and rough conversations: evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Claudia Denke; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?

Authors:  Costanza Papagno; Carlo Cecchetto; Alberto Pisoni; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.