We have shown previously that a potent synthetic antagonist of growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) Src homology 2 (SH2) domain binding (1) blocks growth factor stimulated motility, invasion, and angiogenesis in cultured cell models, as well as tumor metastasis in animals. To characterize the selectivity of 1 for the SH2 domain of Grb2 over other proteins containing similar structural binding motifs, we synthesized a biotinylated derivative (3) that retained high affinity Grb2 SH2 domain binding and potent biological activity. To investigate the selectivity of 1 and 3 for Grb2, the biotinylated antagonist 3 was used to immobilize target proteins from cell extracts for subsequent identification by mass spectrometry. Non-specific binding was identified in parallel using a biotinylated analogue that lacked a single critical binding determinant. The mechanism of action of the antagonist was further characterized by immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, and light microscopy. This approach to defining protein binding antagonist selectivity and molecular basis of action should be widely applicable in drug development.
We have shown previously that a potent synthetic antagonist of growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (n class="Gene">Grb2) Src homology 2 (SH2) domain binding (1) blocks growth factor stimulated motility, invasion, and angiogenesis in cultured cell models, as well as tumor metastasis in animals. To characterize the selectivity of 1 for the SH2 domain of Grb2 over other proteins containing similar structural binding motifs, we synthesized a biotinylated derivative (3) that retained high affinity Grb2 SH2 domain binding and potent biological activity. To investigate the selectivity of 1 and 3 for Grb2, the biotinylated antagonist 3 was used to immobilize target proteins from cell extracts for subsequent identification by mass spectrometry. Non-specific binding was identified in parallel using a biotinylated analogue that lacked a single critical binding determinant. The mechanism of action of the antagonist was further characterized by immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, and light microscopy. This approach to defining protein binding antagonist selectivity and molecular basis of action should be widely applicable in drug development.
Authors: E J Lowenstein; R J Daly; A G Batzer; W Li; B Margolis; R Lammers; A Ullrich; E Y Skolnik; D Bar-Sagi; J Schlessinger Journal: Cell Date: 1992-08-07 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: S K Mitra; D Mikolon; J E Molina; D A Hsia; D A Hanson; A Chi; S-T Lim; J A Bernard-Trifilo; D Ilic; D G Stupack; D A Cheresh; D D Schlaepfer Journal: Oncogene Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Alessio Giubellino; Yang Gao; Sunmin Lee; Min-Jung Lee; James R Vasselli; Sampath Medepalli; Jane B Trepel; Terrence R Burke; Donald P Bottaro Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Z Songyang; S E Shoelson; J McGlade; P Olivier; T Pawson; X R Bustelo; M Barbacid; H Sabe; H Hanafusa; T Yi Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Fa Liu; Alessio Giubellino; Philip C Simister; Wenjian Qian; Michael C Giano; Stephan M Feller; Donald P Bottaro; Terrence R Burke Journal: Biopolymers Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.505
Authors: Tao Xiao; Luxin Sun; Min Zhang; Zilu Li; Eric B Haura; Ernst Schonbrunn; Haitao Ji Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 2.823