| Literature DB >> 18989614 |
Masatoshi Okamatsu1, Yoshihiro Sakoda, Noriko Kishida, Norikazu Isoda, Hiroshi Kida.
Abstract
The hemagglutinins (HAs) of H9 influenza viruses isolated from birds and mammals of different species were antigenically and genetically analyzed. Antigenic variants were selected from A/swine/Hong Kong/10/98 (H9N2) and A/duck/Hokkaido/13/00 (H9N2) in the presence of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Based on the reactivity patterns of these mutants with a panel of MAbs, at least five non-overlapping antigenic sites were defined using eight MAbs which recognized seven distinct epitopes on the H9 HA molecule. Based on the reactivity patterns with the panel of monoclonal antibodies, 21 H9N2 virus strains isolated from birds and mammals were divided into 7 antigenically distinct groups. The present findings indicate that it is important to monitor the antigenic variation in H9 influenza viruses. The panel of MAbs in the present study, thus, should be useful for detailed antigenic analysis of the H9 HAs for epidemiological studies, the selection of vaccine strains, and diagnosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18989614 PMCID: PMC7087127 DOI: 10.1007/s00705-008-0243-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Virol ISSN: 0304-8608 Impact factor: 2.574
H9N2 viruses used in this study
| Lineage | Virus | HA genea |
|---|---|---|
| Eurasian | ||
| Y280 | A/chicken/Hong Kong/G9/97 | AF156373 |
| A/chicken/Hebei/3/98 | AF536695 | |
| A/chicken/Hong Kong/FY20/99 | AF222611 | |
| A/duck/Hong Kong/Y280/97 | AF156376 | |
| A/silkie chicken/Hong Kong/SF43/99 | AF186268 | |
| A/swine/Hong Kong/10/98 | AF222811 | |
| Y439 | A/ostrich/South Africa/9508103/95 | AF218102 |
| A/duck/Hokkaido/31/97 | AB125927 | |
| A/duck/Hokkaido/49/98 | AB125928 | |
| A/duck/Hokkaido/9/99 | AB125929 | |
| A/duck/Hokkaido/26/99 | AB125930 | |
| A/duck/Hokkaido/13/00 | AB125931 | |
| G1 | A/quail/Hong Kong/G1/97 | AF156378 |
| A/quail/Hong Kong/A17/99 | AF222606 | |
| A/chicken/Pakistan/2/99 | AJ291392 | |
| A/Hong Kong/1073/99 | AJ404626 | |
| North American | A/turkey/Wisconsin/1/66 | D90305 |
| A/turkey/Minnesota/38391-6/95 | AF156387 | |
| A/goose/Minnesota/5733-1/80 | AF156389 | |
| A/quail/Arkansas/29209-1/93 | AF156388 | |
| A/shorebird/Delaware/9/96 | AF156386 | |
aGenBank Accession No
Biological properties of monoclonal antibodies to the H9 HA molecule
| Virusa | MAb | Antibody titer | Isotype | Mutation of escape mutants | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleotide | Amino acid | ||||||||
| ELISAb | HI | NT | Positionc | Change | Positiond | Change | |||
| Sw | L6/2 | 7.1 | 80 | 80 | IgG2a | 269 | G → A | 72 | Gly → Glu |
| Sw | G6/5 | 6.5 | 25,600 | 204,800 | IgG1 | 434 | G → A | 127 | Ser → Asne |
| Sw | N4/2 | 6.5 | 2,560 | 20,480 | IgG1 | 496 | A → G | 148 | Asn → Asp |
| Sw | E2/3 | 7.1 | 2,560 | 5,120 | IgG2a | 599 | C → T | 182 | Thr → Ile |
| Sw | L7/7 | 7.1 | 320 | 5,120 | IgG2a | 601 | A → G | 183 | Asn → Asp |
| Sw | G12/1 | 6.5 | 2,560 | 10,240 | IgG2a | 689 | T → A | 212 | Leu → His |
| Dk | D370/4 | 5.9 | 5,120 | 80 | IgG3 | 347 | T → A | 98 | Leu → Gln |
| Dk | D272/6 | 7.7 | 1,280 | 10,240 | IgG1 | 447 | G → A | 131 | Lys → Asne |
aMonoclonal antibodies against A/swine/Hong Kong/10/98 (H9N2) (Sw) or A/duck/Hokkaido/13/00 (H9N2) (Dk)
bTiters are expressed as log10
c,dPositions of nucleotide and amino acid substitutions are numbered according to the HA molecule of H9 subtype virus
eThis amino acid change was predicted to acquire an oligosaccharide chain
Fig. 1Schematic representation of monomer structures of the H9 haemagglutinin molecule, showing the locations of amino acid substitutions on HA1. Images were created with RasMol 2.7.3. a Amino acid changes of escape mutants selected with monoclonal antibody against A/swine/Hong Kong/10/98 (H9N2) (red) and A/duck/Hokkaido/13/00 (H9N2) (blue). The positions of the oligosaccharide attachment sites are shown as green lines. Amino acid positions correspond to H9 numbering. b Hypervariable amino acid positions on HAs of H9N2 viruses clustered in the Y280 lineage isolated from 1994 to 2005
Reactivity patterns of antigenic variants with monoclonal antibodies
| MAb group | MAbs | Sw/HK/00 | Antigenic variants selected froma | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sw/HK/98 | Dk/Hok/00 | ||||||||||
| SwL6/2 | SwG6/5 | SwN4/2 | SwE2/3 | SwL7/7 | SwG12/1 | DkD272/6 | DkD370/4 | Dk/Hok/00 | |||
| 1 | L6/2 | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| 2 | G6/5 | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| 3 | D272/6 | – | – | – | |||||||
| 4 | N4/2 | < | – | – | – | – | |||||
| 5 | E2/3 | – | – | – | – | – | |||||
| L7/7 | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| 6 | G12/1 | – | – | – | – | ||||||
| 7 | D370/4 | – | |||||||||
aEach of the monoclonal antibodies used in variant selection was titrated in ELISA with the antigenic variant
“–” indicates no binding, and no entry indicates significant binding to the variant virus antigen
“<” indicates weak binding compared to the parental virus (ELISA titer decreased 32–64 times)
Amino acid variations in natural isolates
| Amino acid position | Changed amino acids | Surface (S) or inside (I) |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | A, I, T | S |
| 22 | N, S, T | S |
| 45 | D, G, N | S |
| 48 | H, P, R | S |
| 53 | D, K, N | S |
| 69 | I, P, Q | S |
| 94 | I, N, T | S |
| 103 | A, L, S, T | I |
| 131a | K, R, S | S |
| 135b | D, G, N | S |
| 146 | E, H, K, Q | S |
| 148a | D, N, S | S |
| 150 | A, D, S, T | S |
| 153 | I, T, V | S |
| 164 | E, K, R | S |
| 179b | A, N, T | S |
| 180 | A, E, G, T, V | S |
| 182a | D, E, N | S |
| 200 | D, N, T | S |
| 206 | L, M, S, V | S |
| 216b | L, M, Q | S |
| 264 | H, K, N, T, Y | S |
| 265 | G, K, N, R, S | S |
| 267 | D, N, S | S |
| 269 | A, T, V | I |
| 316 | A, S, T | Cleavage site |
| 317 | G, K, R | Cleavage site |
| 318 | A, L, S | Cleavage site |
Amino acid comparison was performed with 133 viruses clustered with Y280 lineage, isolated from 1994 to 2005. Positions were selected in which three or more amino acids were different. Escape mutant has a change in this residue in this study (a) and in that of Kaverin et al. (b) [12]
Reactivity patterns of 21 H9N2 viruses with a panel of monoclonal antibody
| Lineage | Monoclonal antibodiesa | Antigenic group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAb group | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |||
| Virus | L6/2 | G6/5 | D272/6 | N4/2 | E2/3 | L7/7 | G12/1 | D370/4 | ||
| Y280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I |
| Ck/HK/G9/97 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | I | |
| Ck/HK/FY20/99 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | I | |
| Ck/Hb/3/98 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | I | |
| SCk/HK/SF43/99 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | I | |
| Dk/HK/Y280/97 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | I | |
| Y439 | Dk/Hok/31/97 | + |
| + |
|
|
|
| + | II |
| Dk/Hok/49/98 | + |
| + |
|
|
|
| + | II | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| III | |
| Osr/S.Af/9508103/95 | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | IV | |
| Dk/Hok/9/99 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | V | |
| Dk/Hok/26/99 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | V | |
| G1 | Ck/Pak/2/99 | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | VI |
| HK/1073/99 | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | + | II | |
| Qa/HK/G1/97 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | V | |
| Qa/HK/A17/99 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | V | |
| North America | Ty/Wis/1/66 | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | + | III |
| Ty/Min/38391-6/95 | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | + | III | |
| Gs/Min/5733-1/80 | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | + | III | |
| Qa/Ark/2920901/93 | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | IV | |
| Sb/Del/9/96 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | VII | |
Homologous reactions are shown in bold
Sw Swine, Ck chicken, SCk silky chicken, Dk duck, Osr ostrich, Qa quail, Ty turkey, Gs goose, Sb shorebird, HK Hong Kong, Hb Heibei, S. Af South Africa, Hok Hokkaido, Pak Pakistan, Wis Wisconsin, Min Minnesota, Ark Alaska, Del Delaware
aELISA titer ≥ 1:10,000; – ELISA titer < 10,000