Hani Atrash1, Brian W Jack, Kay Johnson. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NCBDDD, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. hatrash@cdc.gov
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study reviews what we know about preconception care, its definition, goals, and content; the science behind the recommended interventions; opportunities for implementing preconception care; and the challenges facing its implementation. RECENT FINDINGS: There is solid scientific evidence that many interventions will improve pregnancy outcomes if delivered before pregnancy or early in pregnancy. Experts continue to explore the most effective means for implementing preconception care, taking into consideration issues related to policy, finance, public health practice, research/surveillance, and consumer and provider education. SUMMARY: Over the past 4 years, there has been renewed interest and a great emphasis on preconception health and healthcare as alternative and additional approaches to counter the persistent increasing incidence in adverse pregnancy outcomes in the United States. Following the publication of the 'Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Healthcare' in 2006, many state and local health departments initiated programs to implement the recommendations. Several countries such as Canada, Belgium, and the Netherlands have also started to implement preconception care programs. There are many opportunities for promoting preconception health and providing preconception care; however, making preconception care a standard practice continues to face many barriers.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study reviews what we know about preconception care, its definition, goals, and content; the science behind the recommended interventions; opportunities for implementing preconception care; and the challenges facing its implementation. RECENT FINDINGS: There is solid scientific evidence that many interventions will improve pregnancy outcomes if delivered before pregnancy or early in pregnancy. Experts continue to explore the most effective means for implementing preconception care, taking into consideration issues related to policy, finance, public health practice, research/surveillance, and consumer and provider education. SUMMARY: Over the past 4 years, there has been renewed interest and a great emphasis on preconception health and healthcare as alternative and additional approaches to counter the persistent increasing incidence in adverse pregnancy outcomes in the United States. Following the publication of the 'Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Healthcare' in 2006, many state and local health departments initiated programs to implement the recommendations. Several countries such as Canada, Belgium, and the Netherlands have also started to implement preconception care programs. There are many opportunities for promoting preconception health and providing preconception care; however, making preconception care a standard practice continues to face many barriers.
Authors: Brian Jack; Timothy Bickmore; Megan Hempstead; Leanne Yinusa-Nyahkoon; Ekaterina Sadikova; Suzanne Mitchell; Paula Gardiner; Fatima Adigun; Brian Penti; Daniel Schulman; Karla Damus Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Stephanie E Rosener; Wendy B Barr; Daniel J Frayne; Joshua H Barash; Megan E Gross; Ian M Bennett Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Esther K Chung; Laila Nurmohamed; Leny Mathew; Irma T Elo; James C Coyne; Jennifer F Culhane Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Paula Gardiner; Megan B Hempstead; Lazlo Ring; Timothy Bickmore; Leanne Yinusa-Nyahkoon; Huong Tran; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Karla Damus; Brian Jack Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2013 Jan-Feb
Authors: R Louise Floyd; Kay A Johnson; Jasmine R Owens; Sarah Verbiest; Cynthia A Moore; Coleen Boyle Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 2.681