Stephanie E Rosener1, Wendy B Barr2, Daniel J Frayne3, Joshua H Barash4, Megan E Gross5, Ian M Bennett6. 1. Middlesex Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Middletown, Connecticut stephanie.rosener@midhosp.org. 2. Lawrence Family Medicine Residency Program, Lawrence, Massachusetts. 3. MAHEC Family Medicine Residency Program, Asheville, North Carolina. 4. Department of Family & Community Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Messiah College, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. 6. Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Interconception care (ICC) is recommended to improve birth outcomes by targeting maternal risk factors, but little is known about its implementation. We evaluated the frequency and nature of ICC delivered to mothers at well-child visits and maternal receptivity to these practices. METHODS: We surveyed a convenience sample of mothers accompanying their child to well-child visits at family medicine academic practices in the IMPLICIT (Interventions to Minimize Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants Through Continuous Improvement Techniques) Network. Health history, behaviors, and the frequency of the child's physician addressing maternal depression, tobacco use, family planning, and folic acid supplementation were assessed, along with maternal receptivity to advice. RESULTS: Three-quarters of the 658 respondents shared a medical home with their child. Overall, 17% of respondents reported a previous preterm birth, 19% reported a history of depression, 25% were smoking, 26% were not using contraception, and 58% were not taking folic acid. Regarding advice, 80% of mothers who smoked were counseled to quit, 59% reported depression screening, 71% discussed contraception, and 44% discussed folic acid. Screening for depression and family planning was more likely when the mother and child shared a medical home (P <.05). Most mothers, nearly 95%, were willing to accept health advice from their child's physician regardless of whether a medical home was shared (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians provide key elements of ICC at well-child visits, and mothers are highly receptive to advice from their child's physician even if they receive primary care elsewhere. Routine integration of ICC at these visits may provide an opportunity to reduce maternal risk factors for adverse subsequent birth outcomes.
PURPOSE: Interconception care (ICC) is recommended to improve birth outcomes by targeting maternal risk factors, but little is known about its implementation. We evaluated the frequency and nature of ICC delivered to mothers at well-child visits and maternal receptivity to these practices. METHODS: We surveyed a convenience sample of mothers accompanying their child to well-child visits at family medicine academic practices in the IMPLICIT (Interventions to Minimize Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants Through Continuous Improvement Techniques) Network. Health history, behaviors, and the frequency of the child's physician addressing maternal depression, tobacco use, family planning, and folic acid supplementation were assessed, along with maternal receptivity to advice. RESULTS: Three-quarters of the 658 respondents shared a medical home with their child. Overall, 17% of respondents reported a previous preterm birth, 19% reported a history of depression, 25% were smoking, 26% were not using contraception, and 58% were not taking folic acid. Regarding advice, 80% of mothers who smoked were counseled to quit, 59% reported depression screening, 71% discussed contraception, and 44% discussed folic acid. Screening for depression and family planning was more likely when the mother and child shared a medical home (P <.05). Most mothers, nearly 95%, were willing to accept health advice from their child's physician regardless of whether a medical home was shared (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians provide key elements of ICC at well-child visits, and mothers are highly receptive to advice from their child's physician even if they receive primary care elsewhere. Routine integration of ICC at these visits may provide an opportunity to reduce maternal risk factors for adverse subsequent birth outcomes.
Authors: Ann S O'Malley; Eugene C Rich; Alyssa Maccarone; Catherine M DesRoches; Robert J Reid Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lorraine V Klerman; Brian W Jack; Dean V Coonrod; Michael C Lu; Yvonne W Fry-Johnson; Kay Johnson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: R Louise Floyd; Brian W Jack; Robert Cefalo; Hani Atrash; Jeanne Mahoney; Anne Herron; Corinne Husten; Robert J Sokol Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ian M Bennett; Andrew Coco; Janice Anderson; Michael Horst; Angela S Gambler; Wendy Brooks Barr; Stephen Ratcliffe Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Radek Bukowski; Fergal D Malone; Flint T Porter; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; Gary D V Hankins; Keith Eddleman; Susan J Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Mary E D'Alton Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Daniel Frayne; Phillip Hughes; Brunilda Lugo; Kathy Foley; Stephanie Rosener; Wendy B Barr; Scott A Davis; Heidi Knoll; Kayla Krajick; Ian M Bennett Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2021-04-28
Authors: Julie Chor; Sarah Garcia-Ricketts; Danielle Young; Luciana E Hebert; Lee A Hasselbacher; Melissa L Gilliam Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2018-05-07
Authors: Jayme L Congdon; Lee A Trope; Janine S Bruce; Paul J Chung; Christine Dehlendorf; Lisa J Chamberlain Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2020-03
Authors: Kim C A Holtkamp; Evelien M Vos; Tessel Rigter; Phillis Lakeman; Lidewij Henneman; Martina C Cornel Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Meertien K Sijpkens; Jacqueline Lagendijk; Minke R C van Minde; Marlou L A de Kroon; Loes C M Bertens; Ageeth N Rosman; Eric A P Steegers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240