Literature DB >> 18989041

Efficient algorithms to explore conformation spaces of flexible protein loops.

Peggy Yao1, Ankur Dhanik, Nathan Marz, Ryan Propper, Charles Kou, Guanfeng Liu, Henry van den Bedem, Jean-Claude Latombe, Inbal Halperin-Landsberg, Russ Biagio Altman.   

Abstract

Several applications in biology - e.g., incorporation of protein flexibility in ligand docking algorithms, interpretation of fuzzy X-ray crystallographic data, and homology modeling - require computing the internal parameters of a flexible fragment (usually, a loop) of a protein in order to connect its termini to the rest of the protein without causing any steric clash. One must often sample many such conformations in order to explore and adequately represent the conformational range of the studied loop. While sampling must be fast, it is made difficult by the fact that two conflicting constraints - kinematic closure and clash avoidance - must be satisfied concurrently. This paper describes two efficient and complementary sampling algorithms to explore the space of closed clash-free conformations of a flexible protein loop. The "seed sampling" algorithm samples broadly from this space, while the "deformation sampling" algorithm uses seed conformations as starting points to explore the conformation space around them at a finer grain. Computational results are presented for various loops ranging from 5 to 25 residues. More specific results also show that the combination of the sampling algorithms with a functional site prediction software (FEATURE) makes it possible to compute and recognize calcium-binding loop conformations. The sampling algorithms are implemented in a toolkit (LoopTK), which is available at https://simtk.org/home/looptk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989041      PMCID: PMC2794838          DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2008.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  26 in total

1.  A novel exhaustive search algorithm for predicting the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins.

Authors:  C M Deane; T L Blundell
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-07-01

2.  A divide and conquer approach to fast loop modeling.

Authors:  Silvio C E Tosatto; Eckart Bindewald; Jürgen Hesser; Reinhard Männer
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2002-04

3.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure.

Authors:  Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all-atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model.

Authors:  Paul I W de Bakker; Mark A DePristo; David F Burke; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-04-01

5.  A kinematic view of loop closure.

Authors:  Evangelos A Coutsias; Chaok Seok; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

7.  Conformational sampling using high-temperature molecular dynamics.

Authors:  R E Bruccoleri; M Karplus
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Real-space protein-model completion: an inverse-kinematics approach.

Authors:  Henry van den Bedem; Itay Lotan; Jean Claude Latombe; Ashley M Deacon
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-12-17

9.  Structure of Ca(2+)-loaded human grancalcin.

Authors:  J Jia; N Borregaard; K Lollike; M Cygler
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2001-11-21

Review 10.  Calcium-binding proteins 1: EF-hands.

Authors:  H Kawasaki; R H Kretsinger
Journal:  Protein Profile       Date:  1995
View more
  14 in total

1.  Protein loop closure using orientational restraints from NMR data.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Tripathy; Jianyang Zeng; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  The effect of end constraints on protein loop kinematics.

Authors:  Steven Hayward; Akio Kitao
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The importance of slow motions for protein functional loops.

Authors:  Aris Skliros; Michael T Zimmermann; Debkanta Chakraborty; Saras Saraswathi; Ataur R Katebi; Sumudu P Leelananda; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Maintaining and Enhancing Diversity of Sampled Protein Conformations in Robotics-Inspired Methods.

Authors:  Jayvee R Abella; Mark Moll; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Characterizing RNA ensembles from NMR data with kinematic models.

Authors:  Rasmus Fonseca; Dimitar V Pachov; Julie Bernauer; Henry van den Bedem
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Computational models of protein kinematics and dynamics: beyond simulation.

Authors:  Bryant Gipson; David Hsu; Lydia E Kavraki; Jean-Claude Latombe
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 10.745

7.  Tracing conformational changes in proteins.

Authors:  Nurit Haspel; Mark Moll; Matthew L Baker; Wah Chiu; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-05-17

8.  A high performance cloud-based protein-ligand docking prediction algorithm.

Authors:  Jui-Le Chen; Chun-Wei Tsai; Ming-Chao Chiang; Chu-Sing Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The FEATURE framework for protein function annotation: modeling new functions, improving performance, and extending to novel applications.

Authors:  Inbal Halperin; Dariya S Glazer; Shirley Wu; Russ B Altman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  SIMS: a hybrid method for rapid conformational analysis.

Authors:  Bryant Gipson; Mark Moll; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.