Literature DB >> 12596261

Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all-atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model.

Paul I W de Bakker1, Mark A DePristo, David F Burke, Tom L Blundell.   

Abstract

The accuracy of model selection from decoy ensembles of protein loop conformations was explored by comparing the performance of the Samudrala-Moult all-atom statistical potential (RAPDF) and the AMBER molecular mechanics force field, including the Generalized Born/surface area solvation model. Large ensembles of consistent loop conformations, represented at atomic detail with idealized geometry, were generated for a large test set of protein loops of 2 to 12 residues long by a novel ab initio method called RAPPER that relies on fine-grained residue-specific phi/psi propensity tables for conformational sampling. Ranking the conformers on the basis of RAPDF scores resulted in selected conformers that had an average global, non-superimposed RMSD for all heavy mainchain atoms ranging from 1.2 A for 4-mers to 2.9 A for 8-mers to 6.2 A for 12-mers. After filtering on the basis of anchor geometry and RAPDF scores, ranking by energy minimization of the AMBER/GBSA potential energy function selected conformers that had global RMSD values of 0.5 A for 4-mers, 2.3 A for 8-mers, and 5.0 A for 12-mers. Minimized fragments had, on average, consistently lower RMSD values (by 0.1 A) than their initial conformations. The importance of the Generalized Born solvation energy term is reflected by the observation that the average RMSD accuracy for all loop lengths was worse when this term is omitted. There are, however, still many cases where the AMBER gas-phase minimization selected conformers of lower RMSD than the AMBER/GBSA minimization. The AMBER/GBSA energy function had better correlation with RMSD to native than the RAPDF. When the ensembles were supplemented with conformations extracted from experimental structures, a dramatic improvement in selection accuracy was observed at longer lengths (average RMSD of 1.3 A for 8-mers) when scoring with the AMBER/GBSA force field. This work provides the basis for a promising hybrid approach of ab initio and knowledge-based methods for loop modeling. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12596261     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  59 in total

1.  Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Discrete restraint-based protein modeling and the Calpha-trace problem.

Authors:  Mark A DePristo; Paul I W De Bakker; Reshma P Shetty; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Small-angle X-ray scattering studies of the oligomeric state and quaternary structure of the trifunctional proline utilization A (PutA) flavoprotein from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ranjan K Singh; John D Larson; Weidong Zhu; Robert P Rambo; Greg L Hura; Donald F Becker; John J Tanner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Modeling large regions in proteins: applications to loops, termini, and folding.

Authors:  Aashish N Adhikari; Jian Peng; Michael Wilde; Jinbo Xu; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Protein loop modeling by using fragment assembly and analytical loop closure.

Authors:  Julian Lee; Dongseon Lee; Hahnbeom Park; Evangelos A Coutsias; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-09-24

6.  Ab initio construction of all-atom loop conformations.

Authors:  Haiyan Jiang; Christian Blouin
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  An algorithm for predicting protein-protein interaction sites: Abnormally exposed amino acid residues and secondary structure elements.

Authors:  Jemima Hoskins; Simon Lovell; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Ab initio computational modeling of long loops in G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Amitava Roy; Ernest L Mehler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  LEAP: highly accurate prediction of protein loop conformations by integrating coarse-grained sampling and optimized energy scores with all-atom refinement of backbone and side chains.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Chi Zhang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force field.

Authors:  Meng Cui; Mihaly Mezei; Roman Osman
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 1.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.