Literature DB >> 18987900

Professional relationships in palliative care decision making.

Susan F Lee1, Linda J Kristjanson, Anne M Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision making in the context of palliative care is particularly complex given the unpredictable illness trajectories experienced by patients and the number of individuals who may be part of decision-making processes. This study aimed to describe the significant issues that influence the processes of care decision making, from the perspective of patients with advanced illness.
METHODS: Patients (14), family members (7) and health professionals (18) were interviewed and field observations (100 h) of decision-making practices were undertaken in two Australian palliative care services. A systematic approach using grounded theory to collect and analyse the data was used to develop a theory of decision making from the patient's perspective.
RESULTS: The main issue experienced by palliative care patients was identified as a lack of involvement in decision making. One of the significant factors affecting the decision process is the type of relationship with health professionals that patients believe enhances their involvement in decision making. This was determined by the manner and focus of the health professional, their trustworthiness as well as the healthcare culture and environment. This paper provides a greater understanding of the perspective of patients in relation to their involvement in decisions related to palliative care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18987900     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0516-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  10 in total

Review 1.  Autonomy, power, and control in palliative care.

Authors:  P A Scott
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The tyrannies of palliative care.

Authors:  S Aranda
Journal:  Int J Palliat Nurs       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  Promoting patient decision making in life-and-death situations.

Authors:  B J Davison; L F Degner
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.315

4.  Interactional styles of nurse practitioners and physicians regarding patient decision making.

Authors:  S G Taylor; J M Pickens; E A Geden
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L F Degner; L J Kristjanson; D Bowman; J A Sloan; K C Carriere; J O'Neil; B Bilodeau; P Watson; B Mueller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Patients' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data.

Authors:  S D Pearson; L H Raeke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  "Symbiotic niceness": constructing a therapeutic relationship in psychosocial palliative care.

Authors:  Sarah Li
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Paternalism and partial autonomy.

Authors:  O O'Neill
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?

Authors:  Nancy Kraetschmer; Natasha Sharpe; Sara Urowitz; Raisa B Deber
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.