| Literature DB >> 18986515 |
Sofie Vandewoestijne1, Nicolas Schtickzelle, Michel Baguette.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Theory predicts that lower dispersal, and associated gene flow, leads to decreased genetic diversity in small isolated populations, which generates adverse consequences for fitness, and subsequently for demography. Here we report for the first time this effect in a well-connected natural butterfly metapopulation with high population densities at the edge of its distribution range.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18986515 PMCID: PMC2587462 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-6-46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Figure 1worldwide (a) and Belgian (b) distribution range. Study sites (c) with number of observed between-population movements (males and females combined) indicated in white.
Genetic, demographic and ecological data collected for five populations of Polyommatus coridon in the Walloon region (i.e. southern Belgium)
| Montagne au Buis | Roche à Lomme | Abannets | Tienne Breumont | Fondy des Chiens | Entire data set | ||
| Genetic data | Sample size (individuals) | 28 | 31 | 25 | 30 | 30 | 144 |
| 0.333 ± 0.056 | 0.309 ± 0.066 | 0.302 ± 0.070 | 0.294 ± 0.063 | 0.313 ± 0.060 | 0.321 ± 0.056 | ||
| 0.364 ± 0.084 | 0.328 ± 0.072 | 0.307 ± 0.078 | 0.339 ± 0.076 | 0.345 ± 0.077 | 0.347 ± 0.033 | ||
| 96. 7 | 90 | 90 | 86.7 | 96.7 | 96.7 | ||
| Demographic data | Census population size | 1620 ± 84 | 384 ± 106 | 171 ± 24 | 630 ± 130 | 2301 ± 130 | |
| 10.86 | 9.43 | 8.86 | 8.46 | 9.50 | |||
| Number of immigrants | 47 | 24 | 21 | 12 | 56 | ||
| Number of emigrants | 55 | 30 | 17 | 12 | 46 | ||
| Landscape and environmental data | Area | 4.3 | 0.67 | 2.77 | 8.03 | 3.97 | |
| Structural connectivity | 0.0035 | 0.0155 | 0.0146 | 0.0038 | 0.0087 | ||
| Microclimatic conditions | -0.228 ± 0.614 | -1.624 ± 1.501 | 1.449 ± 0.595 | 0.094 ± 0.565 | -0.191 ± 0.739 | ||
| Nectar abundance | 39.350 ± 7.417 | 38.583 ± 12.795 | 35.944 ± 8.048 | 26.000 ± 3.406 | 41.391 ± 7.349 | ||
| Host plant abundance | 5.750 ± 3.979 | 5.750 ± 7.112 | 3.810 ± 5.476 | 0.059 ± 0.120 | 1.826 ± 3.603 |
He: expected heterozygosity, Div: average gene diversity, PPL: percentage of polymorphic loci, LTE: lifetime expectancy. A 95% confidence interval is given when available (± half length if symmetrical, lower and upper values when asymmetrical).
Population pairwise θvalues. Bold values signify a significant θvalue at the 0.05 level
| Montagne au Buis | Roche à Lomme | Abannets | Tienne Breumont | |||||
| Roche à Lomme | 0.013 | 0.132 | ||||||
| Abannets | 0.013 | 0.149 | ||||||
| Tienne Breumont | 0.007 | 0.237 | 0.010 | 0.165 | ||||
| Fondry des Chiens | ||||||||
Correlation between genetic diversity, lifetime expectancy, population size and dispersal rate
| Lifetime expectancy ( | Census population size ( | Dispersal rate (number of immigrants) | ||||
| Expected heterozygosity ( | 0.600 | 0.285 | ||||
| Gene diversity ( | 0.700 | 0.188 | 0.700 | 0.188 | ||
| Percentage of polymorphic loci ( | 0.632 | 0.252 | ||||
| Lifetime expectancy ( | 0.600 | 0.285 | ||||
Spearman coefficients (r) in bold are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Correlation between genetic diversity, lifetime expectancy, and surrogates of population size: patch area, microclimatic conditions, nectar and host plant abundance.
| Patch area | Microclimatic conditions | Nectar abundance | Host plant abundance | |||||
| Expected heterozygosity ( | -0.100 | 0.873 | -0.600 | 0.285 | 0.300 | 0.624 | 0.616 | 0.269 |
| Gene diversity ( | 0.600 | 0.285 | -0.400 | 0.505 | -0.200 | 0.747 | 0.051 | 0.935 |
| Percentage of polymorphic loci ( | -0.105 | 0.866 | -0.369 | 0.541 | 0.527 | 0.362 | 0.433 | 0.467 |
| Lifetime expectancy ( | -0.100 | 0.873 | -0.600 | 0.285 | 0.300 | 0.624 | 0.616 | 0.269 |
Spearman coefficients (r) in bold are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Correlation between genetic diversity, lifetime expectancy, and surrogate of dispersal rate: structural connectivity
| Structural connectivity | ||
| Expected heterozygosity ( | -0.300 | 0.624 |
| Gene diversity ( | -0.800 | 0.104 |
| Percentage of polymorphic loci ( | -0.264 | 0.668 |
| Lifetime expectancy ( | -0.300 | 0.624 |
Spearman coefficients (r) in bold are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Figure 2Genetic diversity was positively correlated with lifetime expectancy (. Butterflies from local populations with the highest genetic diversity had a LTE up to c. 25% higher, directly affecting their individual fitness through lifetime reproductive success. Colours refer to sites in Figure 1.
Figure 3The correlation between genetic diversity, represented by the expected heterozygosity . A bootstrap procedure with 1000 random drawings was used to obtain these results (see text for details).