Literature DB >> 16676549

Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly.

Nicolas Schtickzelle1, Gwénaëlle Mennechez, Michel Baguette.   

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation is expected to impose strong selective pressures on dispersal rates. However, evolutionary responses of dispersal are not self-evident, since various selection pressures act in opposite directions. Here we disentangled the components of dispersal behavior in a metapopulation context using the Virtual Migration model, and we linked their variation to habitat fragmentation in the specialist butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Our study provided a nearly unique opportunity to study how habitat fragmentation modifies dispersal at the landscape scale, as opposed to microlandscapes or simulation studies. Indeed, we studied the same species in four landscapes with various habitat fragmentation levels, in which large amounts of field data were collected and analyzed using similar methodologies. We showed the existence of quantitative variations in dispersal behavior correlated with increased fragmentation. Dispersal propensity from habitat patches (for a given patch size), and mortality during dispersal (for a given patch connectivity) were lower in more fragmented landscapes. We suggest that these were the consequences of two different evolutionary responses of dispersal behavior at the individual level: (1) when fragmentation increased, the reluctance of individuals to cross habitat patch boundaries also increased; (2) when individuals dispersed, they flew straighter in the matrix, which is the best strategy to improve dispersal success. Such evolutionary responses could generate complex nonlinear patterns of dispersal changes at the metapopulation level according to habitat fragmentation. Due to the small size and increased isolation of habitat patches in fragmented landscapes, overall emigration rate and mortality during dispersal remained high. As a consequence, successful dispersal at the metapopulation scale remained limited. Therefore, to what extent the selection of individuals with a lower dispersal propensity and a higher survival during dispersal is able to limit detrimental effects of habitat fragmentation on dispersal success is unknown, and any conclusion that metapopulations would compensate for them is flawed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16676549     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1057:ddwhfi]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  32 in total

1.  Butterfly flight activity affects reproductive performance and longevity relative to landscape structure.

Authors:  Melanie Gibbs; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Evolved dispersal strategies at range margins.

Authors:  Calvin Dytham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly.

Authors:  Ilkka A Hanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  On the evolution of dispersal via heterogeneity in spatial connectivity.

Authors:  Renato Henriques-Silva; Frédéric Boivin; Vincent Calcagno; Mark C Urban; Pedro R Peres-Neto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evidence for an optimal level of connectivity for establishment and colonization.

Authors:  Thibaut Morel-Journel; Camille Piponiot; Elodie Vercken; Ludovic Mailleret
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Coupling movement and landscape ecology for animal conservation in production landscapes.

Authors:  Tim S Doherty; Don A Driscoll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Adaptation, speciation and extinction in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Fragmentation mediates thermal habitat choice in ciliate microcosms.

Authors:  Estelle Laurent; Nicolas Schtickzelle; Staffan Jacob
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Variation within and between closely related species uncovers high intra-specific variability in dispersal.

Authors:  Virginie M Stevens; Sandrine Pavoine; Michel Baguette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Weather explains high annual variation in butterfly dispersal.

Authors:  Mikko Kuussaari; Susu Rytteri; Risto K Heikkinen; Janne Heliölä; Peter von Bagh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.