| Literature DB >> 18985034 |
Y Isobe1, K Sugimoto, I Matsuura, K Takada, K Oshimi.
Abstract
We established two Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected NKL sublines, which acquired stress resistant phenotype against DNA damage and starvation compared with EBV-negative NKL. EBV-rendered doxorubicin resistance at least partially through NF-kappaB activation and the resultant sustenance of antiapoptotic proteins including Bcl-X(L) and FLIP(L/S).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18985034 PMCID: PMC2600699 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1(A) NKL and BJAB were infected with Akata-derived EBV. Southern blot analysis detected monoclonal EBV genome in EBV-infected NKL cells. The blotting signal for clone 2 (lane 4) is weaker than those of established EBV-infected NKL sublines named TL1 (lane 5) and TL2 (lane 6), suggesting that clone 2 should contain less copy number of EBV. EBV-infected BJAB appears to consist of two clones (lane 2). (B) TL1 (lane 5) and TL2 (lane 6) express EBNA1 and LMP1, but lack EBNA2 and lytic marker proteins, ZEBRA and EA-D. TPA-treated Akata (lane 1) and EBV-infected BJAB (lane 2) are positive controls of lytic and latent phases, respectively. (C) Time courses of cell count for NKL, TL1, and TL2 at steady state. TL1 and TL2 showed no growth advantage compared with NKL. Alive (trypan-blue negative)- and dead (trypan-blue positive)-cell counts are shown in gray- and black-bars, respectively. (D) Time courses of cell count for NKL, TL1, and TL2 after treatment with 150 nM of doxorubicin (DXR). After 48 h, approximately 60% of NKL cells were dead, whereas above 85% of TL1 and TL2 cells survived. (E) Change in cell morphology after 48 h of treatment with DXR in three lines (Wright–Giemsa stain × 1000). Although both TL1 and TL2 cells had no apparent change in their cell morphology, about half of NKL cells underwent apoptosis (arrowheads). (F) A cell viability assay using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide after 48 h of treatment with 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, DXR, vincristine, and BMS-345541, TL1 and TL2 showed resistance to DXR and VCR treatment compared with NKL. (G) Flow cytometric terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay after treatment with 150 nM of DXR or serum depletion (from 10 to 0.1% of fetal bovine serum). Although about half of NKL cells underwent apoptosis after each treatment, essentially no apoptotic populations were detected in TL1 and TL2. Open arrowheads show TUNEL-positive populations. (H) 7-amino actinomycin D rejection and annexin V-binding assay after treatment with DXR or serum depletion. About half of NKL cells became positive for annexin V after each treatment. In contrast, approximately 90% of TL1 and TL2 cells were negative for annexin V after each treatment.
Figure 2(A) Western blot analysis showed essentially the same expression levels of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, Bax, FLIPL/S, and p53 among NKL, TL1 and TL2. (B) Cell-surface P-glycoprotein was absent not only in NKL but also TL1 and TL2 by flow cytometry. Open histograms show negative control with isotype-matched control antibody. (C) Alterations of antiapoptotic protein levels in NKL and two sublines after doxorubicin (DXR) treatment. Although NKL declined expression levels of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and FLIPL/S after 24 h of DXR treatment (left column), TL1 (middle column) and TL2 (right column) kept to express these proteins, and showed rather increased expression levels of Bcl-XL and FLIPL/S. (D) NF-κB (p65 subunit) binding activity after DXR treatment. Although the binding activity in NKL remained to be its basal level at 24 h, those in TL1 and TL2 increased approximately five times after 12 h and further boosted at 24 h. In contrast, NF-κB inhibitor BMS-345541 almost completely suppressed DXR-induced NF-κB activation in all three lines. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each error bar represents s.d. (E) Alterations of antiapoptotic protein levels in NKL and two sublines after treatment with both DXR and BMS-345541. In the presence of BMS-345541, treatment with DXR clearly decreased expression levels of Bcl-XL and FLIPL/S even in TL1 and TL2. Expression level of Bcl-2 was decreased only in NKL. (F) 7-amino actinomycin D rejection and annexin V-binding assay after treatment with DMSO (control), BMS-345541, DXR, and both BMS-345541 and DXR. Although approximately 5–7% of apoptotic populations were detected in TL1 and TL2 after treatment with 3 μM of BMS-345541 and 150 nM of DXR, respectively, those mixed treatments induced apoptosis in approximately 40% of populations in TL1 and TL2.