Literature DB >> 18984588

ATRMec1 phosphorylation-independent activation of Chk1 in vivo.

Yinhuai Chen1, Julie M Caldwell, Elizabeth Pereira, Robert W Baker, Yolanda Sanchez.   

Abstract

The conserved protein kinase Chk1 is a player in the defense against DNA damage and replication blocks. The current model is that after DNA damage or replication blocks, ATR(Mec1) phosphorylates Chk1 on the non-catalytic C-terminal domain. However, the mechanism of activation of Chk1 and the function of the Chk1 C terminus in vivo remains largely unknown. In this study we used an in vivo assay to examine the role of the C terminus of Chk1 in the response to DNA damage and replication blocks. The conserved ATR(Mec1) phosphorylation sites were essential for the checkpoint response to DNA damage and replication blocks in vivo; that is, that mutation of the sites caused lethality when DNA replication was stalled by hydroxyurea. Despite this, loss of the ATR(Mec1) phosphorylation sites did not change the kinase activity of Chk1 in vitro. Furthermore, a single amino acid substitution at an invariant leucine in a conserved domain of the non-catalytic C terminus restored viability to cells expressing the ATR(Mec1) phosphorylation site-mutated protein and relieved the requirement of an upstream mediator for Chk1 activation. Our findings show that a single amino acid substitution in the C terminus, which could lead to an allosteric change in Chk1, allows it to bypass the requirement of the conserved ATR(Mec1) phosphorylation sites for checkpoint function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984588      PMCID: PMC2610496          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M806530200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  27 in total

1.  RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.

Authors:  R Gardner; C W Putnam; T Weinert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Novel protein kinases and molecular mechanisms of autoinhibition.

Authors:  Graham M T Cheetham
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 3.  The DNA damage response during DNA replication.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 4.  Protein-protein interactions in the allosteric regulation of protein kinases.

Authors:  Patricia Pellicena; John Kuriyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Z Sun; J Hsiao; D S Fay; D F Stern
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T A Navas; Y Sanchez; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  O Cohen-Fix; D Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast.

Authors:  P James; J Halladay; E A Craig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Regulation of mitosis in response to damaged or incompletely replicated DNA require different levels of Grapes (Drosophila Chk1).

Authors:  Amanda Purdy; Lyle Uyetake; Melissa Garner Cordeiro; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  12 in total

1.  CRL4(CDT2) targets CHK1 for PCNA-independent destruction.

Authors:  Jiwon Huh; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Regulatory motifs in Chk1.

Authors:  Michael L Caparelli; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Targeting the checkpoint kinase Chk1 in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Callie Merry; Kang Fu; Jingna Wang; I-Ju Yeh; Youwei Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Karen Finn; Noel Francis Lowndes; Muriel Grenon
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Conformational Change of Human Checkpoint Kinase 1 (Chk1) Induced by DNA Damage.

Authors:  Xiangzi Han; Jinshan Tang; Jingna Wang; Feng Ren; Jinhua Zheng; Megan Gragg; Philip Kiser; Paul S H Park; Krzysztof Palczewski; Xinsheng Yao; Youwei Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  BRD4 facilitates replication stress-induced DNA damage response.

Authors:  Jingwen Zhang; Austin M Dulak; Maureen M Hattersley; Brandon S Willis; Jenni Nikkilä; Anderson Wang; Alan Lau; Corinne Reimer; Michael Zinda; Stephen E Fawell; Gordon B Mills; Huawei Chen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Conserved ATRMec1 phosphorylation-independent activation of Chk1 by single amino acid substitution in the GD domain.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pereira; Yinhuai Chen; Yolanda Sanchez
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Autoregulatory mechanisms of phosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 1.

Authors:  Jingna Wang; Xiangzi Han; Youwei Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Site-specific phosphorylation of the DNA damage response mediator rad9 by cyclin-dependent kinases regulates activation of checkpoint kinase 1.

Authors:  Carla Manuela Abreu; Ramesh Kumar; Danielle Hamilton; Andrew William Dawdy; Kevin Creavin; Sarah Eivers; Karen Finn; Jeremy Lynn Balsbaugh; Rosemary O'Connor; Patrick A Kiely; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt; Muriel Grenon; Noel Francis Lowndes
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Phosphorylation-dependent interactions between Crb2 and Chk1 are essential for DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Meng Qu; Bing Yang; Li Tao; John R Yates; Paul Russell; Meng-Qiu Dong; Li-Lin Du
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.