Literature DB >> 12106947

The effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns and defibrillation threshold during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.

Jian Huang1, Jonathan L Skinner, Jack M Rogers, William M Smith, William L Holman, Raymond E Ideker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns during ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) and defibrillation threshold (DFT).
BACKGROUND: Acute and chronic amiodarone may act through different mechanisms.
METHODS: The VERP, VF activation patterns and DFT were determined in 24 dogs. Twelve dogs received acute intravenous amiodarone (10 mg/kg, n = 6) or saline (n = 6), and 12 dogs received chronic oral amiodarone (20 mg/kg/day, n = 6) or placebo (n = 6). Epicardial VF activation patterns were recorded with 504 electrodes. Quantitative descriptors of VF were calculated.
RESULTS: The DFT was unchanged by acute or chronic amiodarone. Although chronic amiodarone significantly extended the VERP, acute amiodarone did not. In the mapped region, acute and chronic amiodarone decreased the number of VF wavefronts by 42% and 60%. Acute amiodarone decreased conduction block by 22%, while chronic amiodarone increased block by 41% but decreased wave fractionation by 50%. Both chronic and acute amiodarone increased the size of the core of re-entrant circuits and decreased the incidence of re-entry by 44% and 57%; however, chronic amiodarone increased wavelength, while acute amiodarone did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither acute nor chronic amiodarone change the DFT. While both acute and chronic amiodarone decrease the number of wavefronts, decrease the incidence of re-entry and increase the size of re-entrant cores in the mapped region during VF, they achieve these antiarrhythmic effects through different electrophysiologic mechanisms. Chronic amiodarone prolonged the VF cycle length and slowed conduction velocity, indicating it increased the wavelength and/or the excitable gap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12106947     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01942-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  9 in total

1.  High-energy defibrillation increases the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  Yang Pang; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Shujing Ren; Tianyou Ling; Ying Chen; Gang Gu; Yongchu Shen; Liqun Wu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Incidence and clinical predictors of low defibrillation safety margin at time of implantable defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Zhongwei Cheng; Mintu Turakhia; Ronald Lo; Anurag Gupta; Paul C Zei; Henry H Hsia; Amin Al-Ahmad; Paul J Wang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  The impact of catecholamines in patients with or without beta-blockers on the ventricular fibrillation cycle length and ventricular fibrillation cycle length variability.

Authors:  Bokyung Min; Jeffrey Kluger; James S Kalus; Danette Guertin; Brian F McBride; C Michael White
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.

Authors:  James D Allred; Cheryl R Killingsworth; J Scott Allison; Derek J Dosdall; Sharon B Melnick; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker; Gregory P Walcott
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  Effect of drugs on defibrillation capacity.

Authors:  Anna Legreid Dopp; John M Miller; James E Tisdale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Effect of Amiodarone and Hypothermia on Arrhythmia Substrates During Resuscitation.

Authors:  Joseph S Piktel; Yi Suen; Shalen Kouk; Danielle Maleski; Gary Pawlowski; Kenneth R Laurita; Lance D Wilson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Comparison of nifekalant and amiodarone for resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest resulting from shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Nobuya Harayama; Shun-ichi Nihei; Keiji Nagata; Yasuki Isa; Kei Goto; Keiji Aibara; Masayuki Kamochi; Takeyoshi Sata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Antiarrhythmic drugs for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with refractory ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Takashi Tagami; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroyuki Yokota
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Effect of flunarizine on defibrillation outcomes and early refibrillation in a canine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Chaofan Xing; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Shaohua Liu; Changjian Lin; Qiong Wu; Qingzhi Luo; Ao Liu; Liqun Wu
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.