| Literature DB >> 18983651 |
Shiwu Zhang1, Man Li, Yanjun Gu, Zhiyong Liu, Shaoyan Xu, Yanfeng Cui, Baocun Sun.
Abstract
AIMS: To observe the effects of thalidomide on melanoma tumor growth and blood supply patterns in C57 mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18983651 PMCID: PMC2596091 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-60
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Figure 1Effects of thalidomide on B16F10 melanoma growth. Error bars represent standard deviations for the experimental and the control groups. In the early stages of the experiment, there are no significant differences in tumor volume, but from day 12 to day 19 the tumor volume in the treatment group showed a clear reduction compared with the control group. There is statistical significance between these two groups when the mice are sacrificed (P = 0.019).
Figure 2Different microcirculation patterns in melanoma tissue of murine xenograft model. A. Tumor volume in the control group was larger than in the treatment group, suggesting thalidomide inhibits tumor growth. B. VM channel (red arrow) was formed by tumor cells and there were red cells in the center of the channels. PAS-positive substances lined these channels and formed basement membrane-like structure. Yellow arrow indicated EVs presenting in the same field with VM. Endothelial cells were stained as brown by immunohistochemical staining for CD 34, CD34 and PAS double-Staining, 1000×. C. Red arrow showed a VM channel that was lined by brown melanoma cells as well as pink PAS-positive substances. Melanoma cells were identified by HMB45 antibody. HMB45 and PAS double-Staining, 400×. D. In the control group, mitosis was present and VM channels were more numerous under low-magnify field. H&E, 200×.
Comparison of the mean number of three microcirculation patterns between the treatment group and the control group ( ± SD)
| Control (n = 15) | Experimental (n = 15) | t | ||
| VM channels | 1.86 ± 0.89 | 0.58 ± 0.37 | 3.08 | 0.030 |
| MVs | 0.90 ± 0.45 | 0.33 ± 0.19 | 3.54 | 0.004 |
| Endothelium- dependent vessel | 2.22 ± 1.52 | 0.54 ± 0.37 | 2.44 | 0.068 |
* SD: Standard Deviation
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining results of VEGF, NF-κB, MMP-2, MMP-9, and PCNA. VEGF, NF-κB, PCNA, MMP-2, MMP-9 protein expression including the number and staining intensity of positive cells in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control groups. A. VEGF expression in the control group. Tumor cells showed brown cytoplasmic staining. IHC, 400×. B. VEGF expression in the treatment group. IHC, 400×. C. NF-κB expression in the control group. Tumor cells showed brown cytoplasmic staining. The immune reaction in the nuclear was rare in this study. IHC, 400×. D. NF-κB expression in the treatment group. IHC, 400×. E. MMP-2 expression in the control group. Tumor cells showed brown cytoplasmic staining. IHC, 200×. F. MMP-2 expression in the treatment group. IHC, 200×. G. MMP-9 expression in the control group. Tumor cells showed brown cytoplasmic staining. IHC, 200×. H. MMP-9 expression in the treatment group. IHC, 200×. I. PCNA expression in the control group. Tumor cells showed brown nuclear staining. IHC, 200×. J: PCNA expression in the treatment group. IHC, 200×.
Comparison of the mean percentage of positive cells for VEGF, NF-κB, PCNA, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression between the treatment group and the control group ( ± SD)
| Control (n = 15) | Experimental (n = 15) | t | ||
| VEGF | 18.34 ± 2.32 | 13.67 ± 2.51 | 3.47 | 0.004 |
| NF-κB | 17.92 ± 4.45 | 12.21 ± 2.84 | 3.05 | 0.009 |
| MMP-2 | 24.06 ± 3.92 | 10.93 ± 3.35 | 2.36 | 0.000 |
| MMP-9 | 19.32 ± 3.66 | 10.46 ± 3.76 | 2.31 | 0.002 |
| PCNA | 80.94 ± 4.90 | 67.55 ± 7.75 | 2.18 | 0.002 |
* SD: Standard Deviation
Real time PCR results for CT value of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the treatment and the control groups ( ± SD)
| Experiment (n = 15) | Control (n = 15) | t | ||
| MMP-2 | 0.0122 ± 0.0014 | 0.0719 ± 0.0021 | 6.254 | = 0.000 |
| MMP-9 | 0.0025 ± 0.0006 | 0.0198 ± 0.0018 | 11.263 | = 0.000 |
* SD: Standard Deviation