Literature DB >> 18983546

Spherical aberration, visual performance and pseudoaccommodation of eyes implanted with different aspheric intraocular lens.

Xingchao Shentu1, Xiajing Tang, Ke Yao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare spherical aberration, visual performance and pseudoaccommodation in pseudophakic eyes implanted with aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) of Tecnis Z9001 with negative spherical aberration (AMO Inc.), aspheric aberration-free IOLs of Akreos AO (Bausch & Lomb Inc.) and spherical IOLs of KS-1 (Cannon Staar Inc.).
METHODS: A total of 196 patients presenting for cataract surgery were randomly assigned to receive one of three types of IOLs in one eye. Spherical aberration, best-corrected far visual acuity (BCFVA), distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and pseudoaccommodation were measured and compared 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: At 3 months postoperatively, the mean spherical aberration Z(4,0) for 5 mm pupil size in eyes with Tecnis Z9001 IOLs, Akreos AO IOLs, and KS-1 IOLs were 0.022 +/- 0.071 microm, 0.141 +/- 0.070 microm and 0.210 +/- 0.108 microm, respectively (P < 0.001), and significant difference was also found in two aspheric IOLs (P < 0.001). Compared with spherical KS-1 IOLs, Tecnis Z9001 IOLs significantly improved the contrast sensitivity at 4.0 degrees, 2.5 degrees visual angle and glare sensitivity at 4.0 degrees, 2.5 degrees, 2.0 degrees, 1.6 degrees visual angle, Akreos AO IOLs significantly improved contrast sensitivity at 2.5 degrees and glare sensitivity at 4.0 degrees, 2.5 degrees, 2.0 degrees, but no difference statistically significance were found between two aspheric IOLs at any visual angle. In addition, there was no significant difference among three IOLs regarding BCFVA, DCNVA and pseudoaccommodation.
CONCLUSIONS: All the studied IOLs can provide good visual acuity. Compared with spherical IOLs, both aspheric IOLs can significantly decrease spherical aberration and improve visual performance without the reduction of pseudoaccommodation amplitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18983546     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01856.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  6 in total

1.  A new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia.

Authors:  Detlef Uthoff; Markus Pölzl; Daniel Hepper; Detlef Holland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Visual and optical performance of eyes with different corneal spherical aberration implanted with aspheric intraocular lens.

Authors:  Xian-Hui Gong; Qin-Xiang Zheng; Na Wang; Ding Chen; Juan Zhao; Jin Li; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Pan-Pan Ye; Xia Li; Ke Yao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Real and pseudoaccommodation in accommodative lenses.

Authors:  Ioannis G Pallikaris; Georgios A Kontadakis; Dimitra M Portaliou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Refractive and Visual Outcomes of a Monofocal Non-Constant Aberration Aspheric Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Adrián Hernández-Martínez; Miguel A Díaz-Del-Rio; María Ruiz-Santos; Ramón Ruiz-Mesa; Pedro Tañá-Rivero
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-10

6.  Effect of Spherical Aberration on the Optical Quality after Implantation of Two Different Aspherical Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Michael Lasta; Kata Miháltz; Illés Kovács; Pia Veronika Vécsei-Marlovits
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.