Literature DB >> 18983322

Influence of modifying and veneering the surface of ceramic abutments on cellular attachment and proliferation.

Kamal Mustafa1, Ann Wennerberg, Kristina Arvidson, Edvard Berger Messelt, Per Haag, Stig Karlsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study was aimed to investigate the attachment, spreading and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts to milled and polished non-veneered ceramic surfaces in alumina and zirconia and to ceramic surfaces veneered by two different types of porcelain baseliners.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fibroblasts were cultured on discs of pressed alumina or zirconia, on discs which had been milled, on discs comprising alumina or zirconia which had been polished, on discs of alumina veneered with NobelRondo baseliner Al, on discs of zirconia veneered with Cercon-S baseliner, and on alumina or zirconia discs veneered with the above baseliners and then polished. The surfaces were analyzed using an optical interferometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cell profile areas were measured using SEM and an image analyzer. Cell attachment was determined after 3 and 24 h as a ratio of the cell profiles and the total micrograph area and was expressed as percent of attachment. MTT analyses were undertaken to determine cellular attachment after 3 h of incubation and cellular proliferation after 7 days.
RESULTS: The polished zirconia specimens had the smoothest surface in terms of average height deviation (S(a)=0.03 microm): the roughest were the zirconia specimens with milled surfaces (S(a)=0.36 microm). The application of the baseliners resulted in surfaces smoother than those of the non-veneered discs. The milled surfaces of both alumina and zirconia had significantly higher percentages of cell attachment and proliferation than the other surfaces whereas the milled surfaces in zirconia demonstrated better cellular attachment after 3 and 24 h of culture than the one in alumina. Fibroblasts attached and grew effectively on the surfaces veneered with NobelRondo throughout the experiments, whereas the zirconia surfaces veneered with Cercon-S had the lowest percentage of cell attachment and proliferation.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the roughness of all surfaces investigated was <0.4 mum, the study disclosed significant differences in cellular attachment and proliferation associated with the various surface modifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18983322     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  Influence of CAD/CAM all-ceramic materials on cell viability, migration ability and adenylate kinase release of human gingival fibroblasts and oral keratinocytes.

Authors:  A M Pabst; C Walter; L Grassmann; M Weyhrauch; D D Brüllmann; T Ziebart; H Scheller; K M Lehmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vitro assessment of the soft tissue/implant interface using porcine gingival explants.

Authors:  Aous A Abdulmajeed; Jaana Willberg; Stina Syrjänen; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Närhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Cell attachment and proliferation of bone marrow-derived osteoblast on zirconia of various surface treatment.

Authors:  Ahran Pae; Heesu Lee; Kwantae Noh; Yi-Hyung Woo
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Enhanced Biological Behavior of In Vitro Human Gingival Fibroblasts on Cold Plasma-Treated Zirconia.

Authors:  Miao Zheng; Yang Yang; Xiao-Qiang Liu; Ming-Yue Liu; Xiao-Fei Zhang; Xin Wang; He-Ping Li; Jian-Guo Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  3D engineered human gingiva fabricated with electrospun collagen scaffolds provides a platform for in vitro analysis of gingival seal to abutment materials.

Authors:  Wichurat Sakulpaptong; Isabelle A Clairmonte; Britani N Blackstone; Binnaz Leblebicioglu; Heather M Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.