Literature DB >> 18982414

Environmental public health tracking: piloting methods for surveillance of environmentally related diseases in England and Wales.

Patrick Saunders1, Mohammed A Mohammed.   

Abstract

An effective environmental public health tracking system integrates data and intelligence on environmental hazards, exposures, and health outcomes to focus interventions on reducing the impact of environmental contamination on public health. Most work in this area in the UK has focused on assessing data on hazards that are relatively easy to obtain. However, most hazards will present no actual risk and information on exposure is required to make an effective risk assessment. Obtaining exposure data is technically challenging, expensive, and potentially raises ethical concerns. Consequently, the Health Protection Agency is exploring methods for targeting geographical zones for efficient detailed environmental assessment (including exposure assessment). This paper describes and assesses three methods (indirect standardization, statistical process control (SPC) and kernel density contouring) for the surveillance of potentially environmentally related diseases for this purpose. While the evaluation demonstrates the utility of the three methods, particularly SPC, the comparison was limited due to ethical approval issues.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18982414     DOI: 10.1007/s10653-008-9216-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  9 in total

1.  Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites.

Authors:  P Elliott; D Briggs; S Morris; C de Hoogh; C Hurt; T K Jensen; I Maitland; S Richardson; J Wakefield; L Jarup
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

Review 2.  Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement.

Authors:  J C Benneyan; R C Lloyd; P E Plsek
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

Review 3.  Environmental pollution and the global burden of disease.

Authors:  David Briggs
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Using statistical process control to improve the quality of health care.

Authors:  M A Mohammed
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-08

5.  Spatial contouring of risk: a tool for environmental epidemiology.

Authors:  Louise James; Ian Matthews; Barry Nix
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 6.  Review of extant community-based epidemiologic studies on health effects of hazardous wastes.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  How much global ill health is attributable to environmental factors?

Authors:  K R Smith; C F Corvalán; T Kjellström
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Risk of congenital anomalies near hazardous-waste landfill sites in Europe: the EUROHAZCON study.

Authors:  H Dolk; M Vrijheid; B Armstrong; L Abramsky; F Bianchi; E Garne; V Nelen; E Robert; J E Scott; D Stone; R Tenconi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: estimates of morbidity, mortality, and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Clyde B Schechter; Jeffrey M Lipton; Marianne C Fahs; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials.

Authors:  Khara D Grieger; Anders Baun; Richard Owen
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 2.253

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.