Literature DB >> 15097008

Spatial contouring of risk: a tool for environmental epidemiology.

Louise James1, Ian Matthews, Barry Nix.   

Abstract

The possible elevation of disease rates in the proximity of site-specific environmental hazards is much investigated. Single-site studies are subject to problems of reporting bias and statistical power, and multisite studies to heterogeneity of exposure. Both types of studies usually use concentric circular regions centered on a site as a surrogate for defining the exposed and unexposed populations. This approach does not take into account the actual spatial pattern of toxicant dispersion or the spatial pattern associated with the population, and so much useful information is wasted. We report a kernel density technique to map risk contours for disease, which is not influenced by the coordinates of any putative environmental hazard and which could be married to actual spatial exposure patterns.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15097008     DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000121379.57583.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  9 in total

1.  Environmental public health tracking: piloting methods for surveillance of environmentally related diseases in England and Wales.

Authors:  Patrick Saunders; Mohammed A Mohammed
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Combining area-based and individual-level data in the geostatistical mapping of late-stage cancer incidence.

Authors:  Pierre Goovaerts
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

3.  Localized spatial clustering of HIV infections in a widely disseminated rural South African epidemic.

Authors:  Frank Tanser; Till Bärnighausen; Graham S Cooke; Marie-Louise Newell
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Spatial analysis of lung, colorectal, and breast cancer on Cape Cod: an application of generalized additive models to case-control data.

Authors:  Verónica Vieira; Thomas Webster; Janice Weinberg; Ann Aschengrau; David Ozonoff
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Risk of congenital anomalies after the opening of landfill sites.

Authors:  Stephen R Palmer; Frank D J Dunstan; Hilary Fielder; David L Fone; Gary Higgs; Martyn L Senior
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  A simulation study of three methods for detecting disease clusters.

Authors:  Geir Aamodt; Sven O Samuelsen; Anders Skrondal
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 7.  Systematic literature review of reproductive outcome associated with residential proximity to polluted sites.

Authors:  Wahida Kihal-Talantikite; Denis Zmirou-Navier; Cindy Padilla; Séverine Deguen
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.918

8.  From Natural Resources Evaluation to Spatial Epidemiology: 25 Years in the Making.

Authors:  P Goovaerts
Journal:  Math Geosci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.576

9.  Detecting activity locations from raw GPS data: a novel kernel-based algorithm.

Authors:  Benoit Thierry; Basile Chaix; Yan Kestens
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.918

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.