Literature DB >> 1898124

Orthostatic hypotension and birthweight.

M Hohmann1, W Künzel.   

Abstract

This study was designed to test two hypotheses. First, that the changes in arterial blood pressure, induced by a transition from a lying to a standing position, are different in early and late pregnancy. Second, that birthweight is related to the change in mean arterial blood pressure in late pregnancy such that those patients whose pressure fell on standing should have the lightest babies. Fifty-three patients were studied between the 12th to 18th week, and 41 women were between the 34th to 40th week of an accurately dated, clinically normal, singleton pregnancy. Twelve nulliparous females served as controls. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at rest, then in the standing position and finally at rest again with a Dinamap blood pressure measuring device. The variability in the pressor response to standing was approximately three times and in heart rate response two times greater in early pregnancy and in late pregnancy, when compared to the nonpregnant controls. It should be further noted that only in late pregnancy did the heart rate fall in 10 out of 41 women on standing. A linear relationship was observed in late pregnancy between the change in mean arterial blood pressure and birthweight (r = 0.57, P less than 0.001). This linear relationship was improved to r = 0.86, when only those women (16/41), who either had a rise or fall in systolic blood pressure of more than 5 mm Hg were included. These data indicate that pregnancy increases the variability in the pressor response to standing. Moreover, birthweight was directly related to the magnitude and direction of the pressor response in late pregnancy. Finally, this relationship suggests an additional cause for unexplained cases of intrauterine growth retardation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1898124     DOI: 10.1007/bf02390357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  18 in total

1.  Effective uterine bloodflow during exercise in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies.

Authors:  A HART; N MORRIS; S B OSBORN; H P WRIGHT
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1956-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  [Standardization of orthostatic stress. Changes in the blocked volume, arterial influx, and heart rate, under various orthostatic stress].

Authors:  H de Marées; H Jarmatz
Journal:  Med Welt       Date:  1976-09-17

3.  Effect of the left lateral recumbent position compared with the supine and upright positions on placental blood flow in normal late pregnancy.

Authors:  S Suonio; A L Simpanen; H Olkkonen; P Haring
Journal:  Ann Clin Res       Date:  1976-02

4.  Role of bed rest in twin gestation.

Authors:  R L Jeffrey; W A Bowes; J J Delaney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Blood pressure survey in pregnancy.

Authors:  I MacGillivray; G A Rose; B Rowe
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 6.124

6.  Working during pregnancy: effects on the fetus.

Authors:  R L Naeye; E C Peters
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Nomograms for precise determination of birth weight for dates.

Authors:  D G Altman; E C Coles
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-02

8.  Sympathoadrenal and cardiovascular reactivity in pregnancy-induced hypertension. II. Responses to tilting.

Authors:  H Nisell; P Hjemdahl; B Linde; N O Lunell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Plasma catecholamine responses to physiologic stimuli in normal human pregnancy.

Authors:  W M Barron; S K Mujais; M Zinaman; E L Bravo; M D Lindheimer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements.

Authors:  K M Borow; J W Newburger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.