Literature DB >> 18980474

Protection and repair of the injured spinal cord: a review of completed, ongoing, and planned clinical trials for acute spinal cord injury.

Gregory W J Hawryluk1, James Rowland, Brian K Kwon, Michael G Fehlings.   

Abstract

Over the past 2 decades, advances in understanding the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury (SCI) have stimulated the recent emergence of several therapeutic strategies that are being examined in Phase I/II clinical trials. Ten randomized controlled trials examining methylprednisolone sodium succinate, tirilizad mesylate, monosialotetrahexosylganglioside, thyrotropin releasing hormone, gacyclidine, naloxone, and nimodipine have been completed. Although the primary outcomes in these trials were laregely negative, a secondary analysis of the North American Spinal Cord Injury Study II demonstrated that when administered within 8 hours of injury, methylprednisolone sodium succinate was associated with modest clinical benefits, which need to be weighed against potential complications. Thyrotropin releasing hormone (Phase II trial) and monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (Phase II and III trials) also showed some promise, but we are unaware of plans for future trials with these agents. These studies have, however, yielded many insights into the conduct of clinical trials for SCI. Several current or planned clinical trials are exploring interventions such as early surgical decompression (Surgical Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study) and electrical field stimulation, neuroprotective strategies such as riluzole and minocycline, the inactivation of myelin inhibition by blocking Nogo and Rho, and the transplantation of various cellular substrates into the injured cord. Unfortunately, some experimental and poorly characterized SCI therapies are being offered outside a formal investigational structure, which will yield findings of limited scientific value and risk harm to patients with SCI who are understandably desperate for any intervention that might improve their function. Taken together, recent advances suggest that optimism for patients and clinicians alike is justified, as there is real hope that several safe and effective therapies for SCI may become available over the next decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980474     DOI: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  65 in total

1.  Deletion of the pro-apoptotic endoplasmic reticulum stress response effector CHOP does not result in improved locomotor function after severe contusive spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sujata Saraswat Ohri; Melissa A Maddie; Yiping Zhang; Christopher B Shields; Michal Hetman; Scott R Whittemore
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Using the Spinal Cord Injury Common Data Elements.

Authors:  Fin Biering-Sørensen; Susan Charlifue; Michael J Devivo; Stacie T Grinnon; Naomi Kleitman; Yun Lu; Joanne Odenkirchen
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

3.  Acute Treatment Options for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Manjunath Markandaya; Deborah M Stein; Jay Menaker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  A grading system to evaluate objectively the strength of pre-clinical data of acute neuroprotective therapies for clinical translation in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Elena B Okon; Eve Tsai; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; David K Magnuson; Paul J Reier; Dana M McTigue; Phillip G Popovich; Andrew R Blight; Martin Oudega; James D Guest; Lynne C Weaver; Michael G Fehlings; Wolfram Tetzlaff
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Microglial activation in rat experimental spinal cord injury model.

Authors:  Alireza Abdanipour; Taki Tiraihi; Taher Taheri; Hadi Kazemi
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2013

6.  Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Correlates with Neurological Recovery after Human Spinal Cord Injury: Analysis of High Frequency Physiologic Data.

Authors:  Gregory Hawryluk; William Whetstone; Rajiv Saigal; Adam Ferguson; Jason Talbott; Jacqueline Bresnahan; Sanjay Dhall; Jonathan Pan; Michael Beattie; Geoffrey Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  The incomplete picture of incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Robert E Ayer; Farbod Asgarzadie
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 8.  Regenerative therapies for central nervous system diseases: a biomaterials approach.

Authors:  Roger Y Tam; Tobias Fuehrmann; Nikolaos Mitrousis; Molly S Shoichet
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges.

Authors:  Paul J Reier; Michael A Lane; Edward D Hall; Y D Teng; Dena R Howland
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

10.  Higher Mean Arterial Pressure Values Correlate with Neurologic Improvement in Patients with Initially Complete Spinal Cord Injuries.

Authors:  Joshua Stephen Catapano; Gregory William John Hawryluk; William Whetstone; Rajiv Saigal; Adam Ferguson; Jason Talbott; Jacqueline Bresnahan; Sanjay Dhall; Jonathan Pan; Michael Beattie; Geoffrey Manley
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.