Literature DB >> 18978591

Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.

Steven A Rundell1, Joshua D Auerbach, Richard A Balderston, Steven M Kurtz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A validated nonlinear three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of a single lumbar motion segment (L3-L4) was used to evaluate the effects of total disc replacement (TDR). The model was implanted with a fixed-bearing TDR (ProDisc-L) at 2 surgically relevant positions and exercised about the 3 anatomic axes. Facet forces, range of motion (RoM), and vertebral body strains were evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to evaluate how TDR implantation and positioning affects facet joint forces and vertebral body strains. We hypothesized that facet contact forces (FCFs) would increase with TDR to compensate for the loss of periprosthetic load-bearing structures, and that vertebral body strains would increase in the region around the metallic footplates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: TDR has the potential to replace fusion as the gold standard for the treatment of painful degenerative disc disease. However, complications after TDR include index level facet arthrosis and implant subsidence. Alterations in facet and vertebral body loading after TDR and their dependence on implant positioning are not fully understood.
METHODS: An FEM of L3-L4 was created and validated using RoM, disc pressure, and bony strains from previously published data. A TDR was incorporated into the L3-L4 spine model. All models were subjected to a compressive follower load of 500 N and moments of 7.5 Nm about the 3 anatomic axes.
RESULTS: Overall RoM and FCFs tended to increase with TDR. FCFs increased by an order of magnitude during flexion. Posterior placement of the device resulted in an unloading of the facets during extension. Areas of strain maxima were observed in the anterior portion of the vertebral body during flexion after TDR. The area of initial bone resorption signal under the metal footplate was greater when the device was anteriorly placed.
CONCLUSION: The current study predicted a decrease in segmental rotational stiffness resulting from TDR. This resulted from the removal of load bearing soft tissue structures, and caused increased loading in the facets. Additionally, vertebral body strains were generally higher after TDR, and tended to increase with decreased rotational stiffness. Posterior placement of the device provided a more physiologic load transfer to the vertebral body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978591     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318186b258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Stefan Midderhoff; Kyle Adkins; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Association of facet tropism and progressive facet arthrosis after lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Woo Hur; Jin-Sung Kim; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Focal hypermobility observed in cervical arthroplasty with Mobi-C.

Authors:  Jack William Kerferd; David Abi-Hanna; Kevin Phan; Prashanth Rao; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Lumbar total disc replacement by less invasive lateral approach: a report of results from two centers in the US IDE clinical trial of the XL TDR® device.

Authors:  Antoine G Tohmeh; William D Smith
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Adjacent segment movement after monosegmental total disc replacement and monosegmental fusion of segments L4/5].

Authors:  M Däxle; T Kocak; F Lattig; H Reichel; B Cakir
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  Kinematics of total facet replacement (TFAS-TL) with total disc replacement.

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Simon G Sjovold; Michael Funk; Gerard Carandang; Daniel Zindrick; David M Rosler; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2009-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.