Literature DB >> 25794698

Lumbar total disc replacement by less invasive lateral approach: a report of results from two centers in the US IDE clinical trial of the XL TDR® device.

Antoine G Tohmeh1, William D Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following total disc arthroplasty using the XL TDR(®) Lumbar Disc in the treatment of patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease at one level between L1-2 and L4-5.
METHODS: Data were compiled from two centers participating in a prospective, multi-center Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption clinical trial enrolling patients with single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease unresponsive to non-operative treatment. Longitudinal outcomes were evaluated through 3-year follow-up and included patient-reported pain, function, and general health, as well as radiographic measures such as maintenance of disc height and range of motion.
RESULTS: The two-center cohort included 64 treated patients, 42 % female, averaging 45.3 years of age (range 26-67). The majority of procedures were performed at the L4-5 level (75 %), uncomplicated, with minimal blood loss (88 % 0-50 cc), and in an outpatient setting (93.8 %). Postoperative events included 10 patients (15.6 %) with new hip flexion weakness, 7 (10.9 %) with new lower extremity weakness, and 10 (15.6 %) with new lower extremity sensory deficits, all resolved by 3 months in all but two patients whose deficits were prolonged but eventually resolved. Average disc height increased postoperatively from 7.2 to 12.1 mm (69 %), and was 10.7 mm (49 % increase from preoperative) at 3 years. Flexion/extension range of motion averaged 5.9° (SD 4.8°) at 3 years, and was not statistically different from preoperative (p = 0.471). Heterotopic ossification interfering with segmental motion was noted in 3 patients (10.3 %) at 3 years, none ankylosed (Grade IV). Postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcomes was significant (p < 0.01 for all measures) and maintained through 3-year follow-up. Satisfaction with results was reported by 85 % (51/60) of patients at 2 years and 93 % (28/30) at 3 years. There were no revisions through 3 years postoperative.
CONCLUSIONS: The results following XL TDR show good clinical and radiographic outcomes out to 3 years postoperative, with clinically significant improvements in pain, function, and general health, few complications, and high patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25794698     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3843-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

1.  Charité lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique. Technical note.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Roberto Carlos Díaz; Luis Guerrero Guerrero
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-12

2.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients.

Authors:  P Justin Tortolani; Bryan W Cunningham; Mmech Eng; Paul C McAfee; Gwen A Holsapple; Karen A Adams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Le Huec; Virginie Lafage; Xavier Bonnet; François Lavaste; Loic Josse; Minglyan Liu; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-06

4.  A novel modification for removal of the polyethylene core in artificial disc retrieval using a transpsoas minimally invasive technique.

Authors:  Wayne K Cheng; Vikram Jadhav; Daniel K Palmer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-02-11

Review 5.  Total disc replacement for chronic discogenic low back pain: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Niels A van der Gaag; Moyo C Kruyt; Alexander Tuschel; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco C Peul; Abraham J Verbout; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob A de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.

Authors:  C Tournier; S Aunoble; J C Le Huec; J P Lemaire; P Tropiano; V Lafage; W Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Leonardo Oliveira; Thomas Schaffa; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luis Marchi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12-17

9.  A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Scott Blumenthal; Paul C McAfee; Richard D Guyer; Stephen H Hochschuler; Fred H Geisler; Richard T Holt; Rolando Garcia; John J Regan; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

Authors:  Fred H Geisler; Scott L Blumenthal; Richard D Guyer; Paul C McAfee; John J Regan; J Patrick Johnson; Bradford Mullin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  In vitro analysis of circumferential joint replacement, including bilateral facet joint replacement with lateral lumber disc prosthesis: a parametric investigation of disc sizing.

Authors:  Mark Moldavsky; Pavel Neumann; Noelle Klocke; Mir Hussain; Brandon S Bucklen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 3.  Lumbar total disc arthroplasty: outdated surgery or here to stay procedure? A systematic review of current literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Stefano Divano; Luca Cavagnaro; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-07-06

4.  Impact of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disk replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Colleen Hood; Reza Zamani; Mohammad Akrami
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity Between Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty Performed in the Inpatient and Outpatient Settings Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.

Authors:  Austen David Katz; Dean Cosmo Perfetti; Alan Job; Max Willinger; Jeffrey Goldstein; Daniel Kiridly; Peter Olivares; Alexander Satin; David Essig
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.