BACKGROUND: Special observation (the allocation of nurses to watch over nominated patients) is one means by which psychiatric services endeavour to keep in-patients safe from harm. The practice is both contentious and of unknown efficacy. AIMS: To assess the relationship between special observation and self-harm rates, by ward, while controlling for potential confounding variables. METHOD: A multivariate cross-sectional study collecting data on self-harm, special observation, other conflict and containment, physical environment, patient and staff factors for a 6-month period on 136 acute-admission psychiatric wards. RESULTS: Constant special observation was not associated with self-harm rates, but intermittent observation was associated with reduced self-harm, as were levels of qualified nursing staff and more intense programmes of patient activities. CONCLUSIONS: Certain features of nursing deployment and activity may serve to protect patients. The efficacy of constant special observation remains open to question.
BACKGROUND: Special observation (the allocation of nurses to watch over nominated patients) is one means by which psychiatric services endeavour to keep in-patients safe from harm. The practice is both contentious and of unknown efficacy. AIMS: To assess the relationship between special observation and self-harm rates, by ward, while controlling for potential confounding variables. METHOD: A multivariate cross-sectional study collecting data on self-harm, special observation, other conflict and containment, physical environment, patient and staff factors for a 6-month period on 136 acute-admission psychiatric wards. RESULTS: Constant special observation was not associated with self-harm rates, but intermittent observation was associated with reduced self-harm, as were levels of qualified nursing staff and more intense programmes of patient activities. CONCLUSIONS: Certain features of nursing deployment and activity may serve to protect patients. The efficacy of constant special observation remains open to question.
Authors: Alan Simpson; Chris Flood; Julie Rowe; Jody Quigley; Susan Henry; Cerdic Hall; Richard Evans; Paul Sherman; Len Bowers Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: L Bowers; J Alexander; H Bilgin; M Botha; C Dack; K James; M Jarrett; D Jeffery; H Nijman; J A Owiti; C Papadopoulos; J Ross; S Wright; D Stewart Journal: J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 2.952