Literature DB >> 18978117

External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis.

Kim Grootscholten1, Marjolein Kok, S Guid Oei, Ben W J Mol, Joris A van der Post.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. DATA SOURCES: In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1% (95% CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24% for serious complications (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35% for emergency cesarean deliveries (95% CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.93-1.7).
CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978117     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  16 in total

1.  Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Yamasato; Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Anjeza Xholli; Claudia Massarotti; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Association Between Attempted External Cephalic Version and Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality.

Authors:  Moeun Son; Archana Roy; William A Grobman; Emily S Miller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Successful Vaginal Delivery after External Cephalic Version in a Woman with a Large Partial Uterine Septum.

Authors:  Kristen E Park; Nicole L Vestal; Michael S Awadalla; Sharon A Winer
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-05-19

5.  The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies.

Authors:  E K Hutton; M E Hannah; S J Ross; M-F Delisle; G D Carson; R Windrim; A Ohlsson; A R Willan; A Gafni; G Sylvestre; R Natale; Y Barrett; J K Pollard; M S Dunn; P Turtle
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joscha Reinhard; Swati Peiffer; Nicole Sänger; Eva Herrmann; Juping Yuan; Frank Louwen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?

Authors:  Simone M Kuppens; Ida Smailbegovic; Saskia Houterman; Ingrid de Leeuw; Tom H Hasaart
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Talcum powder or aqueous gel to aid external cephalic version: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Narayanan Vallikkannu; Wan Nordin Nadzratulaiman; Siti Zawiah Omar; Khaing Si Lay; Peng Chiong Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term?

Authors:  Emily Ciliacus; Marieke van der Zalm; Sophie E Truijens; Tom H Hasaart; Victor J Pop; Simone M Kuppens
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.

Authors:  N P Watts; K Petrovska; A Bisits; C Catling; C S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.