Literature DB >> 18977805

New time-dependent approach to analyse the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical biomarkers in colon cancer and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

H Adams1, A Tzankov, A Lugli, I Zlobec.   

Abstract

AIMS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is a well-established method to study the accuracies of biological markers. It may, however, be suboptimal for analysing outcomes over time, such as prognosis. Here, the clinical value of time-dependent ROC curve analysis for improving the identification of high-risk patients with colon cancers and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) is explored.
METHODS: Using tissue microarrays, immunohistochemistry was performed on two matched sets (N = 469, each) of colon cancers (p53, CD8(+) tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), mammalian sterile-like 20 kinase 1 (MST1), mucin 2 (MUC2) and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)) and on 208 DLBCL (Bcl2, Bcl6, CD10, FOXP1 and Ki67). The area-under-the-curve (AUC)-over-time plots, cut-off scores for tumour marker positivity and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analysed.
RESULTS: With the exception of uPAR, all markers were most accurate within the first 18 months following diagnosis. Expression of p53 (AUC = 0.75), uPAR (AUC = 0.64), Bcl2 (AUC = 0.58) and FOXp1 (AUC = 0.68) was linked to more aggressive tumours, while TILs (AUC = 0.38), MST1 (AUC = 0.39), MUC2 (AUC = 0.38), Bcl6 (AUC = 0.4), CD10 (AUC = 0.49) and Ki67 (AUC = 0.41) were predictive of improved survival. Cut-off scores for markers at their peak accuracies as well as survival time differences were reproducible between colon cancer groups. Only FOXp1 at its optimal cut-off of 60% had significant effects on survival in DLBCL (p = 0.019).
CONCLUSIONS: Time-dependent ROC curve analysis is a novel tool for identifying potential immunohistochemical prognostic markers across varying follow-up times. Use of this tool could facilitate the identification of high-risk patients not only with colon cancer and DLBCL but with a range of other tumour types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18977805     DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2008.059063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  13 in total

1.  Identification of MST1/STK4 and SULF1 proteins as autoantibody targets for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer by using phage microarrays.

Authors:  Ingrid Babel; Rodrigo Barderas; Ramón Diaz-Uriarte; Víctor Moreno; Adolfo Suarez; María Jesús Fernandez-Aceñero; Ramón Salazar; Gabriel Capellá; J Ignacio Casal
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Genome-wide analysis of the rat colon reveals proximal-distal differences in histone modifications and proto-oncogene expression.

Authors:  Karen Triff; Kranti Konganti; Sally Gaddis; Beiyan Zhou; Ivan Ivanov; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Identifying prognostic intratumor heterogeneity using pre- and post-radiotherapy 18F-FDG PET images for pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Yong Yue; Arsen Osipov; Benedick Fraass; Howard Sandler; Xiao Zhang; Nicholas Nissen; Andrew Hendifar; Richard Tuli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

4.  Pretreatment 18F-FDG Uptake Heterogeneity Predicts Treatment Outcome of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chengcheng Gong; Guang Ma; Xichun Hu; Yingjian Zhang; Zhonghua Wang; Jian Zhang; Yannan Zhao; Yi Li; Yizhao Xie; Zhongyi Yang; Biyun Wang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 5.  Cell surface markers in colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Larissa Belov; Jerry Zhou; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M H Kang; S-I Go; H-N Song; A Lee; S-H Kim; J-H Kang; B-K Jeong; K M Kang; H Ling; G-W Lee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Prognostic Value of MUC2 Expression in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chao Li; Didi Zuo; Libin Yin; Yuyang Lin; Chenguang Li; Tao Liu; Lei Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Preliminary results of targeted prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging in evaluating the efficacy of a novel hormone agent in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Yao Zhu; Hengchuan Su; Xiaoping Xu; Yingjian Zhang; Shaoli Song; Beihe Wang; Dingwei Ye; Silong Hu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Stratifying triple-negative breast cancer prognosis using 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Yong Yue; Xiaojiang Cui; Shikha Bose; William Audeh; Xiao Zhang; Benedick Fraass
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Stratification of Prognosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Using Combinatorial Biomarkers.

Authors:  Yong Yue; Kristine Astvatsaturyan; Xiaojiang Cui; Xiao Zhang; Benedick Fraass; Shikha Bose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.