Literature DB >> 18977654

Proteomics: new technologies and clinical applications.

Martin Latterich1, Mark Abramovitz, Brian Leyland-Jones.   

Abstract

During the past decade, various genomics-based techniques have been applied with increasing success to the molecular characterisation of breast tumours, which has resulted in a more detailed classification scheme and has produced clinical diagnostic tests, which have been applied to both the prognosis and the prediction of outcome to treatment. Application of proteomics-based techniques is also seen as crucial if we are to develop a systems biology approach to the discovery of biomarkers of early diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of outcome to breast cancer therapies. However, proteomics is met with greater challenges to overcome that include optimising specimen handling and preparation, as well as determining the most appropriate proteomic platforms to apply to the identification of differentially expressed biomarker candidates and their subsequent validation. In this review, we explore some of the issues involved in specimen sampling for biomarker screening, proteomic methodologies used to identify biomarkers from clinical specimens including the isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) system as well as strategies to validate biomarkers such as monitoring initiated detection and sequencing-multiple reaction monitoring (MIDAS-MRM). The ultimate goal is to be able to combine both genomics and proteomics-based approaches to the screening, discovery and validation of biomarkers of breast cancer that will help us move towards the individualisation and optimisation of treatment for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18977654     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  33 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Streamlining biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Martin Latterich; Jan E Schnitzer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Personalized medicine: identifying the appropriate patient through biomarkers in oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-07

4.  Plasma proteomic analysis of simian immunodeficiency virus infection of rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Jayme L Wiederin; Robert M Donahoe; James R Anderson; Fang Yu; Howard S Fox; Howard E Gendelman; Pawel S Ciborowski
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of endoscopically collected pancreatic fluid in chronic pancreatitis research.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Linda S Lee; Bechien Wu; Peter A Banks; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Comparative proteomic analysis of plasma membrane proteins between human osteosarcoma and normal osteoblastic cell lines.

Authors:  Zhiyu Zhang; Lijun Zhang; Yingqi Hua; Xiaofang Jia; Jian Li; Shuo Hu; Xia Peng; Pengyuan Yang; Mengxiong Sun; Fang Ma; Zhengdong Cai
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Alcohol-induced alterations in maternal uterine endothelial proteome: a quantitative iTRAQ mass spectrometric approach.

Authors:  Jayanth Ramadoss; Ronald R Magness
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 9.  Phosphoproteomics and cancer research.

Authors:  Keith Ashman; Elena López Villar
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Application of key events analysis to chemical carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; George P Daston; R Julian Preston; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.