Literature DB >> 18977159

Gastrointestinal symptoms under opioid therapy: a prospective comparison of oral sustained-release hydromorphone, transdermal fentanyl, and transdermal buprenorphine.

Stefan Wirz1, Maria Wittmann, Michael Schenk, Andreas Schroeck, Nico Schaefer, Marcus Mueller, Jens Standop, Norbert Kloecker, Joachim Nadstawek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with oral sustained-release hydromorphone, transdermal fentanyl, and transdermal buprenorphine on nausea, emesis and constipation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomly selected outpatients with cancer pain receiving one of the study medications were enrolled in a prospective, open-labeled, controlled trial (n=174). Mobility, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed directly and per selected item on the ECOG (Eastern Cancer Oncology Group), EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) questionnaires, NRS (Numerical Rating Scales), and analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: Demographic and medical data were comparable in all groups. Only 15% of patients suffered from constipation. 59% took the prescribed laxatives. The incidence of stool free periods >72 h was significantly higher with transdermal opioids (transdermal fentanyl: 22%; transdermal buprenorphine: 21%; oral hydromorphone: 2%; p=0.003). 21% of patients revealed nausea and emesis. The mean NRS for nausea (transdermal fentanyl:1.3; transdermal buprenorphine: 1.2; oral hydromorphone: 1.5; p=0.6), the consumption of antiemetics (transdermal fentanyl: 42%; transdermal buprenorphine: 33%; oral hydromorphone: 36%; p=0.6) and laxatives (transdermal fentanyl:53%; transdermal buprenorphine:66%; oral hydromorphone: 61%; p=0.2) did not differ significantly, in contrast to the score for emesis (transdermal fentanyl: 16%; transdermal buprenorphine:13%; oral hydromorphone: 33%; p=0.02). Morphine equivalent opioid doses differed (mg/d transdermal fentanyl: 183; transdermal buprenorphine: 89; oral hydromorphone: 143; p=0.001), because of obvious tolerance varying after long-term treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal symptoms of cancer pain patients undergoing an opioid therapy are related to multifactorial causes. Transdermal opioids showed no benefit over oral controlled-release hydromorphone with regard to gastrointestinal symptoms. The conversion ratios for transdermal fentanyl, transdermal buprenorphine, and oral hydromorphone did not accord to the literature, because of differing occurrences of opioid tolerance after long-term therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18977159     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  23 in total

Review 1.  Safety and efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine for the relief of cancer pain.

Authors:  Cho Naing; Kyan Aung; Vanessa Racloz; Peng Nam Yeoh
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Buprenorphine for treating cancer pain.

Authors:  Mia Schmidt-Hansen; Nathan Bromham; Mark Taubert; Stephanie Arnold; Jennifer S Hilgart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 3.  Use of hydromorphone, with particular reference to the OROS formulation, in the elderly.

Authors:  David Lussier; Ute Richarz; Gabriele Finco
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  [Is the pharmacological treatment of constipation in palliative care evidence based? : a systematic literature review].

Authors:  S Bader; M Weber; G Becker
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  [Incidence of constipation in patients with outpatient opioid therapy].

Authors:  S Tafelski; T Beutlhauser; F Bellin; E Reuter; T Fritzsche; C West; M Schäfer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  Hydromorphone for cancer pain.

Authors:  Yan J Bao; Wei Hou; Xiang Y Kong; Liping Yang; Jun Xia; Bao J Hua; Roger Knaggs
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-11

7.  Transdermal Buprenorphine Patches for Postoperative Pain Control in Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Ajay Kumar Chaudhary; Prithvi Kumar Singh; Reetu Verma; Girish Chandra; Vinod Kumar Bhatia; Dinesh Singh; Jaishri Bogra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihydroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6β-[(4'-pyridyl)carboxamido]morphinan derivatives as peripheral selective μ opioid receptor Agents.

Authors:  Yunyun Yuan; Orgil Elbegdorj; Jianyang Chen; Shashidhar K Akubathini; Feng Zhang; David L Stevens; Irina O Beletskaya; Krista L Scoggins; Zhenxian Zhang; Phillip M Gerk; Dana E Selley; Hamid I Akbarali; William L Dewey; Yan Zhang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Comparison between Transdermal Buprenorphine and Transdermal Fentanyl for Postoperative Pain Relief after Major Abdominal Surgeries.

Authors:  Zia Arshad; Ravi Prakash; Shefali Gautam; Sanjeev Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

10.  Managing severe cancer pain: the role of transdermal buprenorphine: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Deandrea; O Corli; I Moschetti; G Apolone
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.