Literature DB >> 1897659

Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner.

M L Gross1, L B Davlin, P M Evanski.   

Abstract

Five hundred questionnaires were distributed to long-distance runners who had used, or who were using orthotic shoe inserts for symptomatic relief of lower extremity complaints. Three hundred forty-seven (69.4%) responded (males, 71%; females, 29%). The mean age of the respondents was 36 years (range, 15 to 61). The average distance run per week was 39.6 miles (range, 5 to 98). The mean duration for use of the orthotic inserts was 23 months (range, 1 to 96). The predominant (63%) type of orthotic device used was flexible. The presumed diagnoses in the population studied were excessive pronation (31.1%), leg length discrepancy (13.5%), patellofemoral disorders (12.6%), plantar fasciitis (20.7%), Achilles tendinitis (18.5%), shin splints (7.2%), and miscellaneous (4.9%). Of the runners responding, 262 (75.5%) reported complete resolution or great improvement of their symptoms. Results of treatment with orthotic shoe inserts were independent of the diagnosis or the runner's level of participation. A high degree of overall satisfaction was demonstrated by the finding that 90% of the runners continued to use the orthotic devices even after resolution of their symptoms. Orthotic shoe inserts were most effective in the treatment of symptoms arising from biomechanical abnormalities, such as excessive pronation or leg length discrepancy. Along with other conservative measures, orthotic shoe inserts may allow the athlete to continue participation in running and avoid other treatment modalities that are more costly and time consuming, and therefore less acceptable to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1897659     DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  18 in total

Review 1.  Preventing running injuries. Practical approach for family doctors.

Authors:  C A M Johnston; J E Taunton; D R Lloyd-Smith; D C McKenzie
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Ultrasound-guided treatments for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: an update and current status.

Authors:  Nevin T Wijesekera; Ne Siang Chew; Justin C Lee; Adam W Mitchell; James D Calder; Jeremiah C Healy
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Neuromotor control of the lower limb in Achilles tendinopathy: implications for foot orthotic therapy.

Authors:  Narelle Wyndow; Sallie M Cowan; Tim V Wrigley; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The effect of insoles on the incidence and severity of low back pain among workers whose job involves long-distance walking.

Authors:  S Shabat; T Gefen; M Nyska; Y Folman; R Gepstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Effectiveness of orthotic devices in the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa A Scott; Shannon E Munteanu; Hylton B Menz
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Chronic leg pain in a division ii field hockey player: a case report.

Authors:  Julie Snowden; Jonathan A Becker; Joseph A Brosky; Charles Hazle
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-02

Review 7.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of orthotic shoe inserts: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Razeghi; M E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Treatment of lower extremity injuries with orthotic shoe inserts. An overview.

Authors:  M L Gross; R C Napoli
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Metrecom measurement of navicular drop in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  M K Allen; W M Glasoe
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Efficacy of customised foot orthoses in the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: study protocol for a randomised trial.

Authors:  Shannon E Munteanu; Karl B Landorf; Hylton B Menz; Jill L Cook; Tania Pizzari; Lisa A Scott
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.