Literature DB >> 18976261

Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.

F Beuer1, P Neumeier, M Naumann.   

Abstract

The marginal fit of 14-unit fixed dental prosthesis retainers and single-crown copings fabricated by the same computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) system were evaluated in vitro hypothesizing that the marginal opening might be independent of the type of restoration. Eight ivorine maxillary teeth (FDI locations 27, 25, 23, 21, 11, 13, 15 and 17) were prepared to accommodate a 14-unit prosthesis. Ten fixed dental prosthesis retainers and 40 single-crown-copings were fabricated using Zeno CAD/CAM on 20 master dies. Four cross-sections were made from each tooth and the marginal gap dimensions were measured. One-way anova was used to test the difference between the experimental groups and two-way anova and a post hoc test (Student-Newman-Keuls) were carried out to determine the influence of the location of the abutment tooth and the measurement location within the abutment tooth in the experimental groups (P < 0.05). Mean marginal gap dimensions and standard deviations for fixed dental prosthesis retainers and single-crown copings were 25 +/- 29 and 13 +/- 12 microm, respectively. The type of restoration showed a significant influence (P < 0.001) on the marginal gap. The location of the abutment tooth (P < 0.001) and the measurement location (P < 0.001) exhibited significant influence on marginal gaps of fixed dental prosthesis retainers while no influence on single-crown copings could be detected. The highest marginal gaps were found at the palatal surface of the incisor and canine of the 14-unit fixed dental prosthesis retainers. Fourteen-unit fixed dental prosthesis showed significantly higher marginal openings than single crowns fabricated under the same conditions. However, both restorations showed clinically acceptable marginal openings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18976261     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01908.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  7 in total

1.  Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.

Authors:  Joana Schönberger; Kurt-Jürgen Erdelt; Daniel Bäumer; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Internal fit evaluation of indirect restorations fabricated from CAD/CAM composite blocks versus ceramic blocks in badly broken teeth using cone beam CT (CBCT): double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Shereen Hafez Ibrahim; Haitham Amr; Ahmed A Hassan; Ahmed Elzohairy
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Maxillary rehabilitation of periodontally compromised patients with extensive one-piece fixed prostheses supported by natural teeth: a retrospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alexander Heschl; Michael Haas; Josef Haas; Michael Payer; Walther Wegscheider; Raoul Polansky
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Marginal and Internal Precision of Zirconia Four-Unit Fixed Partial Denture Frameworks Produced Using Four Milling Systems.

Authors:  Karl Martin Lehmann; Michael Weyhrauch; Monika Bjelopavlovic; Herbert Scheller; Henning Staedt; Peter Ottl; Peer W Kaemmerer; Stefan Wentaschek
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts.

Authors:  Florian Beuer; Natalie Korczynski; Antonia Rezac; Michael Naumann; Wolfgang Gernet; John A Sorensen
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2010-02-25

6.  Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods.

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Hae-Young Kim; Ji-Hwan Kim; Jae-Hong Kim; Woong-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures.

Authors:  Chuchai Anunmana; Masnisa Charoenchitt; Chanavut Asvanund
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.904

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.