PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of distortion correction with correspondence to numbers of encoding directions to acquire diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of improved quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten volunteers underwent DTI of the head using echo planar imaging with 6, 13, 27, and 55 encoding directions. Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were created before and after distortion correction. Regions of interest were placed in the corpus callosum on each map, and standard deviations of FA and ADC were calculated. FA maps were also evaluated visually by experienced neuroradiologists. RESULTS: Dispersion of standard deviations tended to be reduced after distortion correction, with significant differences found in FA maps with 6 encoding directions, ADC maps with 6 directions, and ADC maps with 13 directions (P < 0.001, P < 0.005, and P < 0.05, respectively). Visual image quality was improved after distortion correction (P < 0.01 for all of the visual comparisons). CONCLUSION: Distortion correction is effective in providing DTI of enhanced quality, notwithstanding the number of encoding directions.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of distortion correction with correspondence to numbers of encoding directions to acquire diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of improved quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten volunteers underwent DTI of the head using echo planar imaging with 6, 13, 27, and 55 encoding directions. Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were created before and after distortion correction. Regions of interest were placed in the corpus callosum on each map, and standard deviations of FA and ADC were calculated. FA maps were also evaluated visually by experienced neuroradiologists. RESULTS: Dispersion of standard deviations tended to be reduced after distortion correction, with significant differences found in FA maps with 6 encoding directions, ADC maps with 6 directions, and ADC maps with 13 directions (P < 0.001, P < 0.005, and P < 0.05, respectively). Visual image quality was improved after distortion correction (P < 0.01 for all of the visual comparisons). CONCLUSION: Distortion correction is effective in providing DTI of enhanced quality, notwithstanding the number of encoding directions.
Authors: C M Ellis; A Simmons; D K Jones; J Bland; J M Dawson; M A Horsfield; S C Williams; P N Leigh Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-09-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J S Shimony; R C McKinstry; E Akbudak; J A Aronovitz; A Z Snyder; N F Lori; T S Cull; T E Conturo Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H Chabriat; S Pappata; C Poupon; C A Clark; K Vahedi; F Poupon; J F Mangin; M Pachot-Clouard; A Jobert; D Le Bihan; M G Bousser Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: F Zelaya; N Flood; J B Chalk; D Wang; D M Doddrell; W Strugnell; M Benson; L Ostergaard; J Semple; S Eagle Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: A G Sorensen; O Wu; W A Copen; T L Davis; R G Gonzalez; W J Koroshetz; T G Reese; B R Rosen; V J Wedeen; R M Weisskoff Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alessia Sarica; Maria Curcio; Laura Rapisarda; Antonio Cerasa; Aldo Quattrone; Francesco Bono Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 4.511