MOTIVATION: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is one of the most important mechanisms in the tumor evolution. LOH can be detected from the genotypes of the tumor samples with or without paired normal samples. In paired sample cases, LOH detection for informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is straightforward if there is no genotyping error. But genotyping errors are always unavoidable, and there are about 70% non-informative SNPs whose LOH status can only be inferred from the neighboring informative SNPs. RESULTS: This article presents a novel LOH inference and segmentation algorithm based on the conditional random pattern (CRP) model. The new model explicitly considers the distance between two neighboring SNPs, as well as the genotyping error rate and the heterozygous rate. This new method is tested on the simulated and real data of the Affymetrix Human Mapping 500K SNP arrays. The experimental results show that the CRP method outperforms the conventional methods based on the hidden Markov model (HMM). AVAILABILITY: Software is available upon request.
MOTIVATION: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is one of the most important mechanisms in the tumor evolution. LOH can be detected from the genotypes of the tumor samples with or without paired normal samples. In paired sample cases, LOH detection for informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is straightforward if there is no genotyping error. But genotyping errors are always unavoidable, and there are about 70% non-informative SNPs whose LOH status can only be inferred from the neighboring informative SNPs. RESULTS: This article presents a novel LOH inference and segmentation algorithm based on the conditional random pattern (CRP) model. The new model explicitly considers the distance between two neighboring SNPs, as well as the genotyping error rate and the heterozygous rate. This new method is tested on the simulated and real data of the Affymetrix Human Mapping 500K SNP arrays. The experimental results show that the CRP method outperforms the conventional methods based on the hidden Markov model (HMM). AVAILABILITY: Software is available upon request.
Authors: Julius Gudmundsson; Patrick Sulem; Thorunn Rafnar; Jon T Bergthorsson; Andrei Manolescu; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Thorarinn Blondal; Margret Jakobsdottir; Simon N Stacey; Jelena Kostic; Kari T Kristinsson; Birgitta Birgisdottir; Shyamali Ghosh; Droplaug N Magnusdottir; Steinunn Thorlacius; Gudmar Thorleifsson; S Lilly Zheng; Jielin Sun; Bao-Li Chang; J Bradford Elmore; Joan P Breyer; Kate M McReynolds; Kevin M Bradley; Brian L Yaspan; Fredrik Wiklund; Par Stattin; Sara Lindström; Hans-Olov Adami; Shannon K McDonnell; Daniel J Schaid; Julie M Cunningham; Liang Wang; James R Cerhan; Jennifer L St Sauver; Sara D Isaacs; Kathleen E Wiley; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Sonia Polo; Manuel Ruiz-Echarri; Sebastian Navarrete; Fernando Fuertes; Berta Saez; Javier Godino; Philip C Weijerman; Dorine W Swinkels; Katja K Aben; J Alfred Witjes; Brian K Suarez; Brian T Helfand; Michael L Frigge; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Carole Ober; Eirikur Jonsson; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Jianfeng Xu; Henrik Gronberg; Jeffrey R Smith; Stephen N Thibodeau; William B Isaacs; William J Catalona; Jose I Mayordomo; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Rosa B Barkardottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-02-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: K Lindblad-Toh; D M Tanenbaum; M J Daly; E Winchester; W O Lui; A Villapakkam; S E Stanton; C Larsson; T J Hudson; B E Johnson; E S Lander; M Meyerson Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Rosalind A Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Graham G Giles; Ali Amin Al Olama; Michelle Guy; Sarah K Jugurnauth; Shani Mulholland; Daniel A Leongamornlert; Stephen M Edwards; Jonathan Morrison; Helen I Field; Melissa C Southey; Gianluca Severi; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David P Dearnaley; Kenneth R Muir; Charmaine Smith; Melisa Bagnato; Audrey T Ardern-Jones; Amanda L Hall; Lynne T O'Brien; Beatrice N Gehr-Swain; Rosemary A Wilkinson; Angie Cox; Sarah Lewis; Paul M Brown; Sameer G Jhavar; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Artitaya Lophatananon; Sarah L Bryant; Alan Horwich; Robert A Huddart; Vincent S Khoo; Christopher C Parker; Christopher J Woodhouse; Alan Thompson; Tim Christmas; Chris Ogden; Cyril Fisher; Charles Jamieson; Colin S Cooper; Dallas R English; John L Hopper; David E Neal; Douglas F Easton Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-02-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Jing Huang; Wen Wei; Jane Zhang; Guoying Liu; Graham R Bignell; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Richard Wooster; Keith W Jones; Michael H Shapero Journal: Hum Genomics Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.639
Authors: Huixiao Hong; Zhenqiang Su; Weigong Ge; Leming Shi; Roger Perkins; Hong Fang; Joshua Xu; James J Chen; Tao Han; Jim Kaput; James C Fuscoe; Weida Tong Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Rameen Beroukhim; Ming Lin; Yuhyun Park; Ke Hao; Xiaojun Zhao; Levi A Garraway; Edward A Fox; Ephraim P Hochberg; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Matthias D Hofer; Aurelien Descazeaud; Mark A Rubin; Matthew Meyerson; Wing Hung Wong; William R Sellers; Cheng Li Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2006-05-12 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: James R Wagner; Bing Ge; Dmitry Pokholok; Kevin L Gunderson; Tomi Pastinen; Mathieu Blanchette Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 4.475