Literature DB >> 18973274

Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces.

Paulo G Coelho1, José M Granjeiro, George E Romanos, Marcelo Suzuki, Nelson R F Silva, Giuseppe Cardaropoli, Van P Thompson, Jack E Lemons.   

Abstract

Among dental implant design alterations, surface modifications have been by far the most investigated topic. Regarding implant surface research, the lack of hierarchical approaches relating in vitro, in vivo, clinical trials, and ex vivo analyses has hindered biomaterials scientists with clear informed rationale guidelines for implant surface design. This manuscript provides a critical hierarchical overview of the in vitro, laboratory in vivo, clinical, and ex vivo methodologies used to investigate the performance of novel biomaterials aiming to allow dental professionals to better evaluate the past, present, and future dental implant surface research. This manuscript also contains an overview of the commercially available surface texture and chemistry modifications including novel nanotechnology-based fabrication processes. Over the last decade, surface texturing has been the most utilized parameter for increasing the host-to-implant response. Recently, dental implant surfaces utilizing reduced length scale physico/chemical features (atomic and nanometric) have shown the potential to synergistically use both texture and the inclusion of bioactive ceramic components on the surface. Although surface modifications have been shown to enhance osseointegration at early implantation times, information concerning its long-term benefit to peri-implant tissues is lacking due to the reduced number of controlled clinical trials. Given the various implants/surfaces under study, the clinician should ask, founded on the basic hierarchical approach described for the in vitro, laboratory in vivo data, as well as the results of clinical studies to effectiveness before use of any dental implant. Copyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18973274     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  52 in total

1.  Morphological and structural characteristics of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Saeed AlSamak; Elias Bitsanis; Margarita Makou; George Eliades
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Positively charged bioactive Ti metal prepared by simple chemical and heat treatments.

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Deepak K Pattanayak; Seiji Yamaguchi; Hiroaki Takadama; Tomiharu Matsushita; Toshiyuki Kawai; Mitsuru Takemoto; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Implant Surface Design Regulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation and Maturation.

Authors:  B D Boyan; A Cheng; R Olivares-Navarrete; Z Schwartz
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  2016-03

4.  Osseointegration behavior of novel Ti-Nb-Zr-Ta-Si alloy for dental implants: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Xiaona Wang; Xing Meng; Shunli Chu; Xingchen Xiang; Zhenzhen Liu; Jinghui Zhao; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Nanotechnology approaches to improve dental implants.

Authors:  Antoni P Tomisa; Maximilien E Launey; Janice S Lee; Mahesh H Mankani; Ulrike G K Wegst; Eduardo Saiz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Effects of titanium surface anodization with CaP incorporation on human osteoblastic response.

Authors:  Natássia Cristina Martins Oliveira; Camilla Christian Gomes Moura; Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa; Daniela Baccelli Silveira Mendonça; Lyndon Cooper; Gustavo Mendonça; Paula Dechichi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 7.328

7.  Reliability evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched versus laser-sintered dental implants.

Authors:  Erika O Almeida; Amilcar C Freitas Júnior; Estevam A Bonfante; Nelson R F A Silva; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  MMP-9 and CD68(+) cells are required for tissue remodeling in response to natural hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Willian F Zambuzzi; Katiúcia B S Paiva; Renato Menezes; Rodrigo C Oliveira; Rumio Taga; José M Granjeiro
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.611

9.  Biological characterization of a new silicon based coating developed for dental implants.

Authors:  M Martínez-Ibáñez; M J Juan-Díaz; I Lara-Saez; A Coso; J Franco; M Gurruchaga; J Suay Antón; Isabel Goñi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Plasma in dentistry.

Authors:  Seunghee Cha; Young-Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Plasma Med       Date:  2014-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.