BACKGROUND: Formalin fixation and paraffin embedding (FFPE) is the standard practice to process surgical specimens in preparation for pathological evaluation. The FFPE procedure is known to introduce adverse effects on RNA quality and the ensuing RNA based expression analysis. However, the overall impact of the FFPE procedure alone on the reliability and accuracy of expression data, without influences from additional compromising factors introduced during long-term storage, has not been vigorously assessed. METHODS: The quality of RNA extracted from recently processed FFPE prostate tissues was examined. FFPE and frozen blocks were prepared from matched surgical specimens and processed in parallel for RNA extraction, two rounds of linear RNA amplification, and genome-wide expression analysis. Expression ratios of prostate cancer versus benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were compared between data derived from the paired FFPE tissues and frozen tissues. RESULTS: RNA extracted from recently processed FFPE prostate tissues was of high quality and suitable for RNA expression analysis. An unbiased analysis of expression data revealed nearly 80% concordance between FFPE tissues and frozen tissues, in genome-wide gene expression differences of cancer versus BPH, and across a wide spectrum of fold expression differences. CONCLUSIONS: FFPE procedure itself does not lead to adverse effects on genome-wide expression analysis. Prospective molecular archiving or modified long-term storage conditions should be implemented to expand the utility of FFPE tissues without compromising standard surgical pathology routines.
BACKGROUND:Formalin fixation and paraffin embedding (FFPE) is the standard practice to process surgical specimens in preparation for pathological evaluation. The FFPE procedure is known to introduce adverse effects on RNA quality and the ensuing RNA based expression analysis. However, the overall impact of the FFPE procedure alone on the reliability and accuracy of expression data, without influences from additional compromising factors introduced during long-term storage, has not been vigorously assessed. METHODS: The quality of RNA extracted from recently processed FFPE prostate tissues was examined. FFPE and frozen blocks were prepared from matched surgical specimens and processed in parallel for RNA extraction, two rounds of linear RNA amplification, and genome-wide expression analysis. Expression ratios of prostate cancer versus benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were compared between data derived from the paired FFPE tissues and frozen tissues. RESULTS: RNA extracted from recently processed FFPE prostate tissues was of high quality and suitable for RNA expression analysis. An unbiased analysis of expression data revealed nearly 80% concordance between FFPE tissues and frozen tissues, in genome-wide gene expression differences of cancer versus BPH, and across a wide spectrum of fold expression differences. CONCLUSIONS: FFPE procedure itself does not lead to adverse effects on genome-wide expression analysis. Prospective molecular archiving or modified long-term storage conditions should be implemented to expand the utility of FFPE tissues without compromising standard surgical pathology routines.
Authors: J Luo; D J Duggan; Y Chen; J Sauvageot; C M Ewing; M L Bittner; J M Trent; W B Isaacs Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Thomas A Dunn; Shenglin Chen; Dennis A Faith; Jessica L Hicks; Elizabeth A Platz; Yidong Chen; Charles M Ewing; Jurga Sauvageot; William B Isaacs; Angelo M De Marzo; Jun Luo Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Maureen Cronin; Mylan Pho; Debjani Dutta; James C Stephans; Steven Shak; Michael C Kiefer; Jose M Esteban; Joffre B Baker Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Sunita R Setlur; Kirsten D Mertz; Yujin Hoshida; Francesca Demichelis; Mathieu Lupien; Sven Perner; Andrea Sboner; Yudi Pawitan; Ove Andrén; Laura A Johnson; Jeff Tang; Hans-Olov Adami; Stefano Calza; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Daniel Rhodes; Scott Tomlins; Katja Fall; Lorelei A Mucci; Philip W Kantoff; Meir J Stampfer; Swen-Olof Andersson; Eberhard Varenhorst; Jan-Erik Johansson; Myles Brown; Todd R Golub; Mark A Rubin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Anita Lal; Rebecca Panos; Mira Marjanovic; Michael Walker; Eloisa Fuentes; Daniel S Kapp; W David Henner; Ljubomir J Buturovic; Meredith Halks-Miller Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2012-02
Authors: Javier A Baena-Del Valle; Qizhi Zheng; Jessica L Hicks; Helen Fedor; Bruce J Trock; Colm Morrissey; Eva Corey; Toby C Cornish; Karen S Sfanos; Angelo M De Marzo Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Tamara Sequeiros; Marta García; Melania Montes; Mireia Oliván; Marina Rigau; Eva Colás; Inés de Torres; Juan Morote; Jaume Reventós; Andreas Doll Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 3.411