BACKGROUND: Current approaches to evaluating pain in children with chronic arthritis suffer from methodological problems. A real-time data capture approach using electronic diaries has been proposed as a new standard for pain measurement. However, there is limited information available regarding the development and feasibility of this approach in children. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to pilot test the e-Ouch electronic pain diary in terms of compliance and acceptability in adolescents with arthritis to further refine the prototype. METHODS: A descriptive study design -- with two iterative phases of testing, modifying the prototype and retesting -- was used. A purposive sample of 13 adolescents with mild to severe pain and disability was drawn from a large rheumatology clinic in a university-affiliated pediatric tertiary care centre in Canada over a four-week period in December 2004. Participants were signalled with an alarm to use the diary three times per day for a two-week period. Adolescents completed an electronic diary acceptability questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall mean compliance rates for phases 1 and 2 were 72.9% and 70.5%, respectively. Compliance was affected by the timing of data collection and technical difficulties. Children rated the diary as highly acceptable and easy to use. Phase 1 testing revealed aspects of the software program that affected compliance, which were subsequently altered and tested in phase 2. No further technical difficulties arose in phase 2 testing. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility testing is a crucial first step in the development of electronic pain measures before use in clinical and research practice.
BACKGROUND: Current approaches to evaluating pain in children with chronic arthritis suffer from methodological problems. A real-time data capture approach using electronic diaries has been proposed as a new standard for pain measurement. However, there is limited information available regarding the development and feasibility of this approach in children. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to pilot test the e-Ouch electronic pain diary in terms of compliance and acceptability in adolescents with arthritis to further refine the prototype. METHODS: A descriptive study design -- with two iterative phases of testing, modifying the prototype and retesting -- was used. A purposive sample of 13 adolescents with mild to severe pain and disability was drawn from a large rheumatology clinic in a university-affiliated pediatric tertiary care centre in Canada over a four-week period in December 2004. Participants were signalled with an alarm to use the diary three times per day for a two-week period. Adolescents completed an electronic diary acceptability questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall mean compliance rates for phases 1 and 2 were 72.9% and 70.5%, respectively. Compliance was affected by the timing of data collection and technical difficulties. Children rated the diary as highly acceptable and easy to use. Phase 1 testing revealed aspects of the software program that affected compliance, which were subsequently altered and tested in phase 2. No further technical difficulties arose in phase 2 testing. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility testing is a crucial first step in the development of electronic pain measures before use in clinical and research practice.
Authors: Jennifer N Stinson; Bonnie J Stevens; Brian M Feldman; David Streiner; Patrick J McGrath; Annie Dupuis; Navreet Gill; Guy C Petroz Journal: Pain Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Carol K Whalen; Barbara Henker; Larry D Jamner; Sharon S Ishikawa; Joshua N Floro; Ralph Swindle; Amy R Perwien; Joseph A Johnston Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2006-02-04
Authors: Kelly M Dumais; Nadeeka Dias; Laura Khurana; Sarah Tressel Gary; Brooke Witherspoon; Christopher J Evans; Susan M Dallabrida Journal: Patient Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Charles R Jonassaint; Chaeryon Kang; Daniel M Abrams; Jingyi J Li; Jason Mao; Yimeng Jia; Qi Long; Maureen Sanger; Jude C Jonassaint; Laura De Castro; Nirmish Shah Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Jennifer N Stinson; Lindsay A Jibb; Cynthia Nguyen; Paul C Nathan; Anne Marie Maloney; L Lee Dupuis; J Ted Gerstle; Benjamin Alman; Sevan Hopyan; Caron Strahlendorf; Carol Portwine; Donna L Johnston; Mike Orr Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 5.428