Literature DB >> 15473498

Electronic diaries and questionnaires: designing user interfaces that are easy for all patients to use.

Mikael Palmblad1, Brian Tiplady.   

Abstract

We propose a set of requirements for designing handheld computer systems for electronic collection of patient diary and questionnaire data in clinical trials: (1) the system should be suitable for use by all types of patient to be included in the clinical trial programme; (2) patients must be capable of using the system and be comfortable with it after a short period of training; (3) responses should always result from an action by the user--defaults should not be taken as data; (4) all information necessary to a given question should be simultaneously available on the screen. This applies to both the questions and the response options. We present guidelines as to how these requirements may be met in practice, so that bias may be avoided both in patient selection and in the responses made; so that electronic data collection may be as effective as possible, and so that study procedures are convenient and unobtrusive for the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15473498     DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000037501.92374.e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  12 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for the design of a Web-based clinical monitoring and educational system for elderly patients.

Authors:  G Demiris; S M Finkelstein; S M Speedie
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Patient non-compliance with paper diaries.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Saul Shiffman; Joseph E Schwartz; Joan E Broderick; Michael R Hufford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

3.  Assessment of postsurgical recovery after discharge using a pen computer diary.

Authors:  A Begg; G Drummond; B Tiplady
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Quality of quality-of-life data.

Authors:  L Fallowfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Electronic diaries for asthma.

Authors:  B Tiplady; G K Crompton; D Brackenridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

6.  Do asthmatic patients correctly record home spirometry measurements?

Authors:  P J Chowienczyk; D H Parkin; C P Lawson; G M Cochrane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-17

7.  On-line computerized diagnosis of pain-related disability and psychological status of TMD patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  A U Yap; K B Tan; J K Hoe; R H Yap; J Jaffar
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.837

8.  Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference.

Authors:  B D Bliven; S E Kaufman; J A Spertus
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Robert N Jamison; Richard H Gracely; Stephen A Raymond; Jonathan G Levine; Barbara Marino; Timothy J Herrmann; Margaret Daly; David Fram; Nathaniel P Katz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Computer anxiety: a comparison of pen-based personal digital assistants, conventional computer and paper assessment of mood and performance.

Authors:  H M Tseng; B Tiplady; H A Macleod; P Wright
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1998-11
View more
  22 in total

1.  Electronic Patient Diaries and Questionnaires - ePRO Now Delivering on the Promise?

Authors:  Brian Tiplady
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Electronic Diaries: Appraisal and Current Status.

Authors:  Joan E Broderick
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2008-01-01

3.  The implementation of an integrated information system for substance use screening in general medical settings.

Authors:  C W Shanahan; A Sorensen-Alawad; B L Carney; I Persand; A Cruz; M Botticelli; K Pressman; W G Adams; M Brolin; D P Alford
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Electronic data capture using the Womac NRS 3.1 Index (m-Womac): a pilot study of repeated independent remote data capture in OA.

Authors:  Nicholas Bellamy; B Patel; T Davis; S Dennison
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 5.  Measures of asthma control.

Authors:  Christian Bime; Jessica Nguyen; Robert A Wise
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.155

6.  Personal digital assistant data capture: the future of quality of life measurement in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Andrew G Matthew; Kristen L Currie; Paul Ritvo; Robert Nam; Michael E Nesbitt; Robin W Kalnin; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Outcome assessment via handheld computer in community mental health: consumer satisfaction and reliability.

Authors:  Lizabeth A Goldstein; Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; Sarah M Thompson; Kelli Scott; Laura Heintz; Patricia Green; Donald Thompson; Paul Crits-Christoph
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.505

8.  Working out the kinks: testing the feasibility of an electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis.

Authors:  J N Stinson; G C Petroz; B J Stevens; B M Feldman; D Streiner; P J McGrath; N Gill
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires to assess asthma control and therapeutic responses in asthma clinical trials: is participant burden worth the effort?

Authors:  Adesua Y Okupa; Christine A Sorkness; David T Mauger; Daniel J Jackson; Robert F Lemanske
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Electronic Questionnaires Design and Implementation.

Authors:  Clara Minto; Giulia Beltrame Vriz; Matteo Martinato; Dario Gregori
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2017-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.