BACKGROUND: Low glycemic index (GI) carbohydrates have been linked to increased satiety. The drive to eat may be mediated by postprandial changes in glucose, insulin and gut peptides. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a low and a high GI diet on day-long (10 h) blood concentrations of glucose, insulin, cholecystokinin (CCK) and ghrelin (GHR). DESIGN:Subjects (n=12) consumed a high and a low GI diet in a randomized, crossover design, consisting of four meals that were matched for macronutrients and fibre, and differed only in carbohydrate quality (GI). Blood was sampled every 30-60 min and assayed for glucose, insulin, CCK and GHR. RESULTS: The high GI diet resulted in significantly higher glucose and insulin mean incremental areas under the curve (IAUC, P=0.027 and P=0.001 respectively). CCK concentration was 59% higher during the first 7 h of the low GI diet (394+/-95 pmol/l min) vs the high GI diet (163+/-38 pmol/l min, P=0.046), but there was no difference over 10 h (P=0.224). GHR concentration was inversely correlated with insulin concentration (Pearson correlation -0.48, P=0.007), but did not differ significantly between the low and high GI diets. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed meals of lower GI are associated with lower day-long concentrations of glucose and insulin, and higher CCK after breakfast, morning tea and lunch. This metabolic profile could mediate differences in satiety and hunger seen in some, but not all, studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Low glycemic index (GI) carbohydrates have been linked to increased satiety. The drive to eat may be mediated by postprandial changes in glucose, insulin and gut peptides. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a low and a high GI diet on day-long (10 h) blood concentrations of glucose, insulin, cholecystokinin (CCK) and ghrelin (GHR). DESIGN: Subjects (n=12) consumed a high and a low GI diet in a randomized, crossover design, consisting of four meals that were matched for macronutrients and fibre, and differed only in carbohydrate quality (GI). Blood was sampled every 30-60 min and assayed for glucose, insulin, CCK and GHR. RESULTS: The high GI diet resulted in significantly higher glucose and insulin mean incremental areas under the curve (IAUC, P=0.027 and P=0.001 respectively). CCK concentration was 59% higher during the first 7 h of the low GI diet (394+/-95 pmol/l min) vs the high GI diet (163+/-38 pmol/l min, P=0.046), but there was no difference over 10 h (P=0.224). GHR concentration was inversely correlated with insulin concentration (Pearson correlation -0.48, P=0.007), but did not differ significantly between the low and high GI diets. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed meals of lower GI are associated with lower day-long concentrations of glucose and insulin, and higher CCK after breakfast, morning tea and lunch. This metabolic profile could mediate differences in satiety and hunger seen in some, but not all, studies.
Authors: Frank M Sacks; Vincent J Carey; Cheryl A M Anderson; Edgar R Miller; Trisha Copeland; Jeanne Charleston; Benjamin J Harshfield; Nancy Laranjo; Phyllis McCarron; Janis Swain; Karen White; Karen Yee; Lawrence J Appel Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paula C Chandler-Laney; Shannon A Morrison; Laura Lee T Goree; Amy C Ellis; Krista Casazza; Renee Desmond; Barbara A Gower Journal: Appetite Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Jimmy Chun Yu Louie; Tania P Markovic; Glynis P Ross; Deborah Foote; Jennie C Brand-Miller Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Ann G Liu; Marlene M Most; Meghan M Brashear; William D Johnson; William T Cefalu; Frank L Greenway Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Huaidong Du; Karani S Vimaleswaran; Lars Angquist; Rikke D Hansen; Daphne L van der A; Claus Holst; Anne Tjønneland; Kim Overvad; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Heiner Boeing; Karina Meidtner; Domenico Palli; Giovanna Masala; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Wim H M Saris; Edith J M Feskens; Nicolas J Wareham; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Ruth J F Loos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Liza A H Rosén; Lorena O Blanco Silva; Ulrika K Andersson; Cecilia Holm; Elin M Ostman; Inger M E Björck Journal: Nutr J Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Yingfei Wu; Stephen P Juraschek; Jiun-Ruey Hu; Noel T Mueller; Lawrence J Appel; Cheryl A M Anderson; Edgar R Miller Journal: J Nutr Date: 2021-08-07 Impact factor: 4.687