Literature DB >> 18956277

[The value of Doppler cardiotocogram computer analysis system 70 minutes before delivery].

S Schiermeier1, H Hatzmann, J Reinhard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the second half of the 20th century, foetal wellbeing has been assessed using cardiotocography (CTG) during labour. Many studies have shown that the CTG has very high intra- and interobserver variability. Many score systems have been developed for more objective analysis of the foetal heart rate. The German Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology recommends the use of computerised analysis programmes for CTG evaluation in order to reduce subjectivity. This study examines whether there is a correlation of foetal outcome with computerised CTG analysis using the "CTG-Online" programme.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 1,251 consecutive deliveries, two groups were selected depending on foetal outcome (very good foetal outcome [n=76] and poor foetal outcome [n=56]). The last 70 min before delivery were evaluated using "CTG-Online" and "CTG-Player". These results were correlated with foetal outcome.
RESULTS: In the time interval of 25 to 5 min before delivery, the FIGO parameter "deceleration" had a statistically significant correlation with poor foetal outcome (p<0.0199). Variability and acceleration showed no correlation during the evaluation period. Five minutes before delivery the baseline showed a weak statistically significant correlation with foetal outcome (p<0.0290).
CONCLUSIONS: Norm values of the FIGO parameters baseline, acceleration and deceleration should be re-examined using large computer databases. Computerised analyses of the FIGO parameter for deceleration is promising, however, further studies are needed to increase its sensitivity and specificity.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18956277     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol        ISSN: 0948-2393            Impact factor:   0.685


  3 in total

1.  Non-invasive Foetal ECG - a Comparable Alternative to the Doppler CTG?

Authors:  J Reinhard; F Louwen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Prenatal Foetal Non-invasive ECG instead of Doppler CTG - A Better Alternative?

Authors:  N Sänger; B R Hayes-Gill; S Schiermeier; W Hatzmann; J Yuan; E Herrmann; F Louwen; J Reinhard
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Open access intrapartum CTG database.

Authors:  Václav Chudáček; Jiří Spilka; Miroslav Burša; Petr Janků; Lukáš Hruban; Michal Huptych; Lenka Lhotská
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.